芝士医生-3D解剖听课刷题读片

医学生及医学教育工作者的智慧医教平台

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

In-Apps

季卡
4,990.00 ₸
年卡
7,990.00 ₸
月卡
1,990.00 ₸
50芝士
3,490.00 ₸
98芝士
7,990.00 ₸
208芝士
14,990.00 ₸
518芝士
34,990.00 ₸

Screenshots

Loading...
Please wait..

芝士医生 FAQ

  • Is 芝士医生 free?

    Yes, 芝士医生 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 芝士医生 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 芝士医生 cost?

    芝士医生 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 10,918.57 ₸.

  • What is 芝士医生 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 芝士医生 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Kazakhstan yet.
Ratings History

芝士医生 Reviews

No Reviews in Kazakhstan
App doesn't have any reviews in Kazakhstan yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

芝士医生 Competitors

Name
PMP考试必备,手机词典—幸运PMP
口才喵行家端
随时考
职教人
镇江高专
临床医学检验技士全题库
人卫临床思维
学好病例,做好医生
仙翁養生時鐘
小鹿听听-11000+集睡前故事
10000+集名著睡前故事,永久听
饼干题库-四级六级真题题库
四六级题库,无纸化刷题

芝士医生 Installs

Last 30 days

芝士医生 Revenue

Last 30 days

芝士医生 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 芝士医生 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Medical
Languages
Arabic, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Chinese, Slovak, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, Ukrainian, Vietnamese
Recent release
3.0.6 (1 week ago )
Released on
Oct 2, 2023 (1 year ago )
Last Updated
1 week ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.