Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论

Hinterfrage deine Sichtweisen!

Published by: Dario Digregorio
Downloads
Revenue

Description

老实说:在线辩论通常是毫无成效的争吵。人们各说各话,意见变得更加根深蒂固,没有人真正学到任何东西。Apol 的出现就是为了改变这种情况。
Apol 利用先进 AI 的力量来改变我们在线讨论的方式。只需输入任何主题(从气候变化到菠萝披萨辩论),Apol 就会创建一个结构化的讨论空间,其中包含进行富有成效且引人入胜的对话所需的一切。
- 关键问题:Apol 会自动生成发人深省的问题,旨在引发有见地的讨论和不同的观点,帮助您了解问题的全部复杂性。
- 智能 AI 角色:与独特的 AI 角色互动,每个角色都有自己的专业知识和观点,从而挑战您的假设并拓宽您的理解。
- 可视化讨论:Apol 会生成对话的动态可视化表示形式,突出显示同意和分歧的领域,使其更易于理解。观察参与者的观点如何随着讨论的进行而演变。
- 总结论点:通过 AI 生成的参与者主要观点的简明摘要来比较和对比他们的观点。
- AI 主题建议:Apol 会建议引人入胜且发人深省的主题,帮助您发现新的兴趣领域和辩论。
Apol 的出现是为了改变我们在线讨论的方式,为重要的对话带来清晰度、深度,甚至还有一点乐趣!
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 FAQ

  • Is Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 free?

    Yes, Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 cost?

    Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 is free.

  • What is Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in China yet.
Ratings History

Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 Reviews

No Reviews in China
App doesn't have any reviews in China yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Apol Installs

Last 30 days

Apol Revenue

Last 30 days

Apol:用AI更聪明地辩论 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Apol performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Publisher
Dario Digregorio
Languages
English
Recent release
0.7.8 (1 month ago )
Released on
Oct 1, 2024 (2 months ago )
Last Updated
2 weeks ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.