中国邮政

手机邮局

Published by: China Post Group

Description

中国邮政APP是中国邮政集团有限公司官方出品的全新手机应用软件,整合旗下包裹、报刊、封片卡、媒体资源为一体的综合服务平台,具有查询,购买,退订、售后、管理等功能,方便用户线上办理邮政业务。
【您还可以关注】
中国邮政网上营业厅:http://www.11185.cn/
中国邮政官方微信服务号:微信服务号查找“中国邮政微邮局”

Screenshots

中国邮政 FAQ

  • Is 中国邮政 free?

    Yes, 中国邮政 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 中国邮政 legit?

    ⚠️ The 中国邮政 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 中国邮政 cost?

    中国邮政 is free.

  • What is 中国邮政 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 中国邮政 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Ireland yet.
Ratings History

中国邮政 Reviews

差 卡 不显示 on

China

差 一颗不想给 寄了东西下了单也不显示 卡死了 垃圾

垃圾邮政

海工工 on

China

垃圾, 跳转微信小程序,那还要你APP干嘛。 客服半天不理人,半天回一句自己看。 那还问客服干嘛

app和小程序太垃圾了

20180201 on

China

中国邮政app和小程序简直太垃圾了,最难用的之最,无人能及!

更新版本就是为了让用户刷脸?

☁️音乐用户 on

China

:(

卧龙凤雏级别

为了什么而存在 on

China

一家产品不说两家话,属实都是垃圾级别了,一星都给不了,别家一星是垃圾,而这个能给一星只是因为系统最低只能给一星

垃圾软件 连密码重置都这么复杂 聊着聊着就客服掉线

ma没喝酒 on

China

垃圾

垃圾邮政

678464946 on

China

邮政是我见过物流最最最垃圾的,网购8年一共出现过三次物流一个月才到的情况,全是邮政。

国有企业就是高贵

Lop6789 on

China

发货总是一拖再拖,太垃圾了,邮票滥发滥印,没有一点创作精神,怪不得现在集邮爱好者越来越少,邮票就是废纸一般

12.4闪退,可以修复一下吗?

i系列 on

China

12.4闪退,可以修复一下吗?

不是哥们?

我的世界七年玩家 on

China

我按了三次,三次上门取件一点消息没有啊?软件根本不显示有没有邮寄东西,我下单三次次次不显示啊?

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
131
Top Free
382

Keywords

中国邮政 Competitors

中国邮政 Installs

Last 30 days

中国邮政 Revenue

Last 30 days

中国邮政 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 中国邮政 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.