山海与妖灵 - 洪荒封神传奇国风仙侠游戏!

精品开放世界动作冒险手游!

Published by: Baifeng Networks

Description

【割草乱斗,挂机修炼】
游戏内置手动/自动双战斗功能,玩家可自由选择战斗模式,割草乱斗或佛系挂机两不误,离线也有收益,众修仙者不肝不氪即可随时随地,轻松修仙。
【拍卖系统,交易自由】
刷boss打金爆装备,不同职业的装备可上架拍卖行自由交易,货币流通,畅爽游戏,让玩家有身临其境的感受,体验代入感极强的游戏世界。

In-Apps

60元宝
¥6.00
120元宝
¥12.00
180元宝
¥18.00
300元宝
¥30.00
680元宝
¥68.00
980元宝
¥98.00
1280元宝
¥128.00
1980元宝
¥198.00
3280元宝
¥328.00
6480元宝
¥648.00

Screenshots

山海与妖灵 FAQ

  • Is 山海与妖灵 free?

    Yes, 山海与妖灵 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 山海与妖灵 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 山海与妖灵 cost?

    山海与妖灵 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥153.40.

  • What is 山海与妖灵 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 山海与妖灵 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3.72 out of 5

43 ratings in China

5 star
28
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
2
1 star
12
Ratings History

山海与妖灵 Reviews

15区进不去了 管理员

你到底是睡美人 on

China

15区进不去了?

进不去

A小雷子 on

China

怎么进都进不去

垃圾游戏

qwxjfkcnejzn on

China

压根进不去,一直显示错误

没有最垃圾,只有更垃圾

Iisfish on

China

这么垃圾的游戏谁给你们的脸在抖音做广告直播的。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

山海与妖灵 Competitors

山海与妖灵 Installs

Last 30 days

山海与妖灵 Revenue

Last 30 days

山海与妖灵 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 山海与妖灵 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Publisher
Baifeng Networks
Languages
English
Recent release
1.0 (2 years ago )
Released on
Nov 1, 2022 (2 years ago )
Also available in
China
Last Updated
5 days ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.