Description

是否想念过往在桌上游戏的趣味?简易的图版,再搭配鲜明的棋子,是否勾起你童年的乐趣呢?
此款「无路可走」是一款益智休闲小游戏,可支持两位玩家同时游乐,画风简易且非常适合再任何时刻与家人朋友之间互相游乐。
游戏玩法:两位玩家,选择棋盘大小(分成5X5、7X7、9X9),游戏开始后,先手玩家先行落子,再每回合落子至少2颗,最多可以落子5颗,除了第一回合的第一颗棋没有特别要求,剩馀的每一颗棋皆需与前一颗棋相连,不可以不相连。胜负的判定在于,如果其中一方无法在棋盘上找到对应相连的两个位置可以落子,则对方获胜。
游戏规则:每颗落子的棋,可以是上下相连,或这左右相连,但是不允许斜向相连,棋盘上的棋子多寡,不影响胜负判定。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

无路可走 FAQ

  • Is 无路可走 free?

    Yes, 无路可走 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 无路可走 legit?

    ⚠️ The 无路可走 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 无路可走 cost?

    无路可走 is free.

  • What is 无路可走 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 无路可走 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

2.68 out of 5

154 ratings in China

5 star
49
4 star
15
3 star
7
2 star
4
1 star
79
Ratings History

无路可走 Reviews

赌钱的

讨厌剧透啊老婆呢 on

China

赌钱的。怎么上架的

赌博诈骗

上个v高干 on

China

害死人,玩了3个月输了10个w,全是电脑控制!假的很

这游戏简直是诈骗

zyhsle on

China

玩的死路一条,赚钱不容易别送钱给诈骗分子,千万别下载,不然家破人亡,这游戏控制你的大脑,下载了就乖乖的送钱给他

求链接

阿狸阿狸梦呀 on

China

求链接

害死多少人 剁手

英兴 on

China

玩的都死

害人

我住的疯人院六楼 on

China

真的不能玩 一个礼拜50个 不吐 真的就是杀猪

多人少玩的家破人亡

桐城小彪子 on

China

没人管管吗

国家默许软件

wuluketao728 on

China

服了,china关系强大到无路可逃

别碰

别碰哦 on

China

别碰

拉假假假 on

China

千万别碰啊,我输了860万了

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

无路可走 Installs

Last 30 days

无路可走 Revenue

Last 30 days

无路可走 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 无路可走 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.