App is temporarily unavailable

指尖工具宝-古单位换算

古长度、古面积、古时间、古货币等的换算

Downloads
Revenue

Description

古代度量单位即古代的容量、长度或者重量单位等。
常见容量单位有石、豆和斛;常见重量单位有石、钧;常见长度单位有:跬、仞、舍和寻。
自秦朝以来,历朝历代多建有度量衡单位制度,而且变革较多,单位量值呈逐渐增大的趋势。民国时期,河南于1932年曾在部分县实施《度量衡法》,推行公制,但各县政府并未完全执行。1937年,日本侵占河南以后,旧制复燃,市场上新旧制同时使用。中华人民共和国成立后,河南进行过3次重大计量制度改革。一是1959年的贯彻了国务院《关于统一计量制度的命令》;二是1978年全省改革了医用戥秤;三是1985年贯彻国务院《关于在我国统一实行法定计量单位的命令》。计量单位三次重大改革,都是在各级政府统一组织领导下,全面认真进行,而且改革得比较彻底。截止到1987年,除少数民众仍存有旧制计量器具外,政府机关、部门、企事业单位等都按照国家规定的计量制度使用了法定的计量器具
我国度量衡历史悠久。据古书记载:自夏代以来,不仅有了度量衡器具,而且还建立了度量衡制度。春秋战国时期,度量衡单位制度混乱。战国后期,度量衡制度形成了由混乱逐步走向统一的发展趋势。秦、隋统一全国后,都采取了统一度量衡制度的措施。特别是秦朝建立的度量衡制度,对我国以后各代的度量衡制度有着深远的影响。唐、宋、元、明、清、民国都建有度量衡制度,而晚清和民国时期,度量衡单位制极为混乱。民国虽曾颁布《度量衡法》,统一度量衡,但全国度量衡单位制终未统一。

在这里,
我们提供现代长度、面积、时间、货币等单位与中国古代单位之间的换算。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

指尖工具宝-古单位换算 FAQ

  • Is 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 free?

    Yes, 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 cost?

    指尖工具宝-古单位换算 is free.

  • What is 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

指尖工具宝-古单位换算 Reviews

No Reviews in Japan
App doesn't have any reviews in Japan yet.

指尖工具宝-古单位换算 Installs

Last 30 days

指尖工具宝-古单位换算 Revenue

Last 30 days

指尖工具宝-古单位换算 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 指尖工具宝-古单位换算 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Reference
Languages
Recent release
1.3 (1 year ago )
Released on
Aug 8, 2023 (1 year ago )
Last Updated
1 year ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.