最爛的就是每次都有登入是怎樣
每次都要登入是怎樣 爛透了 iRent 也是
Description
和運租車基於「顧客為先、專業為本」的理念，不斷努力改善服務流程，並持續提供符合顧客期待的各項創新商品與專業服務，和運租車除已建構43個全國N0.1服務據點, 近年更屢屢領先業界推出創新服務:甲租乙還、以時計費、加滿油、假日延長營業時間、多項玩趣配備租借，除了節省顧客荷包，更為地球環保盡一份心力。
Screenshots
和運租車 FAQ
-
Is 和運租車 free?
Yes, 和運租車 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.
-
Is 和運租車 legit?
⚠️ The 和運租車 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.
-
How much does 和運租車 cost?
和運租車 is free.
-
What is 和運租車 revenue?
To get estimated revenue of 和運租車 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
1.38 out of 5
90 ratings in Taiwan
5 star
4
4 star
1
3 star
6
2 star
3
1 star
76
Ratings History
和運租車 Reviews
登入步驟 繁瑣
看來都不會修改👎🏻
爛到沒剩
沒想到全台汽車市占率最大的集團，做出這麼爛、操作反人性的app，一直需要登入會員、刷卡成功出現訂單失敗...罄竹難書。各大企業app都可以face ID登入，貴公司的app還在石器時代...賺那麼多錢卻不願意做更好，不願再買貴公司的產品了
無法註冊
浪費時間
登入介面的無法輸入帳號密碼
投機取巧用 Web view 兜出來的 app, 結果沒測行動裝置相容性，登入頁面只會鬼打牆
超乎想像欸
超乎想像的爛 什麼年代了註冊還這麼不方便 傳個照片也不行 查網路發現這個問題至少三年了 這麼久也不修一修 對了我是從圖庫選照片傳不上去 直接拍才成功上傳 遇到同樣問題的人可以試試看
登入方式很不方便
為什麼不能用臉部辨識呢？每次都要重新輸入帳號密碼，那不就跟網頁一樣嗎？根本不用App呀。
WebView套皮
就網頁套皮封裝成APP而已，帳密輸入鍵盤還能出問題，整體上比網頁還爛（當然網頁已經很爛了）。iRent APP就寫得很好
爛
爛
無法滑動選擇租車地點
入題
Store Rankings
Ranking History
Category Rankings
|
Chart
|
Category
|
Rank
|
|---|---|---|
|
Top Free
|
|
165
|
和運租車 Competitors
和運租車 Installs
Last 30 days
和運租車 Revenue
Last 30 days和運租車 Revenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into 和運租車 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
App Info
- Category
- Travel
- Publisher
-
HOING MOBILITY SERVICE CO
- Languages
- English
- Recent release
- 2.2.14 (8 months ago )
- Released on
- Dec 31, 2014 (10 years ago )
- Also available in
- Taiwan
- Last Updated
- 6 days ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.