建工题库 - 一建二建建工考试题库

海量题库,专注刷题

Published by: 汉斌 李

Description

包含一级建造师、二级建造师、造价工程师、八大员、安全工程师、消防工程师等考试题库。
海量题库,专注刷题,多题型详细解析。
帮助考生利用零散、有限的时间高效地掌握考试重点、难点,提升备考能力。
希望能为考生了解考试规律、节省复习时间、提高考试成绩提供有效的帮助。
更好的体验、断网下也可答题,充分利用上下班路上等碎片时间提高考试成绩。

In-Apps

移除广告
¥15.00

Screenshots

建工题库 FAQ

  • Is 建工题库 free?

    Yes, 建工题库 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 建工题库 legit?

    ‼️️ The 建工题库 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 建工题库 cost?

    建工题库 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥15.00.

  • What is 建工题库 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 建工题库 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.43 out of 5

390 ratings in China

5 star
301
4 star
35
3 star
11
2 star
5
1 star
38
Ratings History

建工题库 Reviews

弹窗广告根本去除不了,点进去就不能用了

天还长 on

China

点进去就是大众点评广告,而且根本没有关闭按钮,所以做这个app干嘛?

开了会员换了手机就登不上了

的举报信巴基耶夫努力更好看 on

China

开了会员换了手机就登不上了

全是广告 恶心

贾森基德接电话都不喝酒吗 on

China

全是广告 恶心

好用

我是谁呢啊哈哈 on

China

好用继续用

非常不方便

象象象像 on

China

广告多就算了,做完题整体没有错题总结,准备卸载

掌上软件

阳阳,,,, on

China

这个不错,能答题能纠错

不好

哎回归 on

China

广告太多,题目太少

免费就是好东西!

土星塞布 on

China

很棒

很好

善哉也是一 on

China

使用很好

垃圾 全是广告

hdhdbjdvr on

China

垃圾

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

建工题库 Competitors

建工题库 Installs

Last 30 days

建工题库 Revenue

Last 30 days

建工题库 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 建工题库 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.