废都-无删减珍藏版

废都三部曲经典小说阅读

Published by: 创 曹
Downloads
Revenue

Description

此《废都》为海外珍藏版,内容全面未经删减。
废都曾经被作为禁书17年。
此App包含:废都、高兴、古炉、秦腔、怀念狼、白夜、浮躁、平凡的世界、白鹿原等小说
《废都》是作者贾平凹写出的一部反映80年代的中国社会风俗史。小说采用了中国古典的草灰蛇线手法,而融入了西方的意识流和精神气质,中西合璧。《废都》也创造了一种新的语言,这在文学史上是不可多得的。被禁17年之后,贾平凹的《废都》再度出版。

Screenshots

废都-无删减珍藏版 FAQ

  • Is 废都-无删减珍藏版 free?

    Yes, 废都-无删减珍藏版 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 废都-无删减珍藏版 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 废都-无删减珍藏版 cost?

    废都-无删减珍藏版 is free.

  • What is 废都-无删减珍藏版 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 废都-无删减珍藏版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

1.5 out of 5

6 ratings in China

5 star
0
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
5
Ratings History

废都-无删减珍藏版 Reviews

废都真费了,花钱买了打不开

双清堂 on

China

怎么打不开

打不开,闪退,求解决

一直关注并支持者 on

China

如题

只能说是个骗子

Jerry.J.H on

China

不仅是本删节版而且还是个拼凑版,相当垃圾的一个App更主要的是相当垃圾的一个应用编写者。建议苹果因其不诚信而将其下架并给予严惩~!

骗子!关于性的部分根本不是作者的原著!

Grasshappy on

China

关于性的部分根本不是作者的原著!是用随便的三流黄色小说的写法给补上的。与作者原意背道而驰。还是iphone版的那个免费的版本是原版。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
30
Top Paid
283
Top Paid
297
Top Paid
303
Top Paid
375

Keywords

废都-无删减珍藏版 Competitors

Name
世界名画大全
名家帮你解读名画
诗词助手
听聊斋志异
中原术数类专著古籍
古典文学作品集
必读《四大名著》
九州断代古籍
九州儒家类古籍
诗经 - 中国第一部诗歌杂谈总集
诗三百-国学经典系列的全方位深度解析
富里阁
热门书单无限畅读,小说追书神器
名著宝典
爱上名著、享受阅读

废都-无删减珍藏版 Installs

Last 30 days

废都-无删减珍藏版 Revenue

Last 30 days

废都-无删减珍藏版 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 废都-无删减珍藏版 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.