尺书

明信片和书信的社区

Downloads
Revenue

Description

明信片交友、收集、分享;
给TA或未来的你写封信。
支持电子信和纸质信代寄。
亲笔信保管到未来。

从前车马很远,书信很慢,一生只够爱一个人。
在这个快节奏的信息化时代,还有这样一群人。
具有书写的动手能力、乐于分享生活的兴趣、仪式生活的塑造情怀、文艺范的雅致气质。
目前还不知道怎么称呼他们,还没有一个精准的词。

尺书2.0给你们和他们一个定义。

Screenshots

尺书 FAQ

  • Is 尺书 free?

    Yes, 尺书 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 尺书 legit?

    🤔 The 尺书 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 尺书 cost?

    尺书 is free.

  • What is 尺书 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 尺书 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Sweden yet.
Ratings History

尺书 Reviews

写出曾经也写出来遗憾 on

China

很好呀

非常棒!!!

卿云悠哉 on

China

欢迎同样喜欢寄片的小伙伴们👏

一个小建议

萍九九七 on

China

建议在“查看地址”后设置一个“一键复制”地址、姓名和电话的功能。如果是打印信封的话,这样会方便很多。感谢开发者。

我飞奔过来好评

都懂(滑稽 on

China

简洁 好用 安全 作为一个新手,我在里面学会了好多好多寄信/片的技巧,也找到了很好的笔友,呜呜,我爱尺书

谢谢老板老爹家人们

派大星为什么一直有重复昵称 生气 on

China

我也算是老人了吧 2开头 一开始还不太清楚明信片的寄法 慢慢了解 也结实了好多朋友 大家真的都很友善 老爹似乎很爱散片哈哈哈有钱人 有时候都不知道回什么才能表示我的心意呢 有个bug就是很久没登app靠谱值会下降 有点难受啊我没骗片也没拖片 靠谱值从100掉到七八十也伤害了我的心 总之老板一直在努力地改进迟书 微信群里大家也都很热情哈哈哈哈 希望尺书越来越好哦 苹果朋友们快用它!!入股不亏哦

很好

zyhfish0606 on

China

评论不多,体验很好,支持!

Nice

腐视 on

China

就是人太少了,不仅可以互寄,还有就是可以写信送到未来的自己或别人,竟然有纸质的

喜欢

过河采蘑菇 on

China

简洁👍

很好的软件

ltdy2012 on

China

看到评论不多就来支持,大家觉得好的都来评论啊

很好👌👌👌

AlleyCen on

China

很好

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

尺书 Installs

Last 30 days

尺书 Revenue

Last 30 days

尺书 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 尺书 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.