道德经 - 老子国学经典诵读

拼音排版道德经有声版

Published by: 海云 吴

Description

《道德经》是春秋时期老子(李耳)的哲学作品,又称《道德真经》、《老子》、《五千言》、《老子五千文》,是中国古代先秦诸子分家前的一部著作,是道家哲学思想的重要来源。道德经分上下两篇,原文上篇《德经》、下篇《道经》,不分章,后改为《道经》37章在前,第38章之后为《德经》,并分为81章。
《道德经》文本以哲学意义之“道德”为纲宗,论述修身、治国、用兵、养生之道,而多以政治为旨归,乃所谓“内圣外王”之学,文意深奥,包涵广博,被誉为万经之王。
《道德经》是中国历史上最伟大的名著之一,对传统哲学、科学、政治、宗教等产生了深刻影响。据联合国教科文组织统计,《道德经》是除了《圣经》以外被译成外国文字发布量最多的文化名著。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

道德经 FAQ

  • Is 道德经 free?

    Yes, 道德经 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 道德经 legit?

    ⚠️ The 道德经 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 道德经 cost?

    道德经 is free.

  • What is 道德经 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 道德经 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.8 out of 5

5,603 ratings in China

5 star
5,139
4 star
173
3 star
80
2 star
33
1 star
178
Ratings History

道德经 Reviews

广告太多

网上邻居 on

China

可以打开购买通道

都挺好,就是广告太多!太麻烦、

无为,无名 on

China

广告太多、广告太垃圾

广告能不能去掉?

宁清兮 on

China

看了一遍广告,还是一直出来广告?作者能不能更新一下

里面的广告会让我抓狂😫

不好用,烂。 on

China

里面的广告会让我抓狂😫

一堆广告 买本书看看也挺好的

uiiiiuy y on

China

一堆广告

其实可以适当收费的

5星评级师 on

China

不用一直弹广告

广告太多了

行不海龙 on

China

都是广告 无法去除

广告多

哇卡卡的猫 on

China

之前体验很好,现在广告多起来了,用起来不太方便了。

怎么说呢

玩碎玩碎玩玩碎 on

China

虽然有点广告碍眼的毛病,但我觉得算是小毛病,主要是我看了好多有道德经的app,感觉就这个最好用,而且翻译的挺好记的,还有拼音注释。

全是广告

鄙视你丫的 on

China

全是广告

Store Rankings

Ranking History
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
229
Top Free
260
Top Free
318
Top Free
485

Keywords

道德经 Installs

Last 30 days

道德经 Revenue

Last 30 days

道德经 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 道德经 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.