App is temporarily unavailable

建基百載攝影馬拉松

Downloads
Revenue

Description

「建基百載」攝影馬拉松是一個應用程式,讓你可使用手機,拍攝和提交相片參加比賽,及/或進行相片投票。該應用程式由香港建造商會有限公司提供。

Screenshots

建基百載攝影馬拉松 FAQ

  • Is 建基百載攝影馬拉松 free?

    Yes, 建基百載攝影馬拉松 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 建基百載攝影馬拉松 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 建基百載攝影馬拉松 cost?

    建基百載攝影馬拉松 is free.

  • What is 建基百載攝影馬拉松 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 建基百載攝影馬拉松 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3 out of 5

3 ratings in Hong Kong SAR China

5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
1
Ratings History

建基百載攝影馬拉松 Reviews

上山下海冇命賠

無業 on

Hong Kong SAR China

衷心佩服做程式測試的人,這麼明顯同豐富嘅問題,竟然完全冇發現到出嚟,簡直浪費參與者嘅時間。 那個地圖上標示嘅位置更加係嚇死人,多個地點標錯位置唔再講,有啲地點竟然喺海中心,按住指示可能要用潛水艇落水底先搵到佢個地點。真係唔知道到評審嘅時候,是否用返水底嗰個位置才會是正確? 活動過程去的地方體驗亦都讓人大開眼界,其中按指示去食水濾水廠,去到竟然是臭氣熏天的污水處理廠,難道主辦機構想讓我們知道,我們天天飲用的食水就是由充滿臭味的臭水抽出嚟? 又有某大機構嘅數據中心,好像神秘組織一樣,門口保安堅決不肯透露該地方嘅名稱;並指是高層指示及機構政策;另外又有機構以不友善的態度不歡迎拍照,舉辦活動的機構有沒有跟這此地方溝通?實在令人懷疑。 亦有一些所謂建築物,其實是未建成或者尚未存在,難道參加者要坐時光機去未來,才可以影到這些建築物的真正面貌? 再加上一堆彈app及上傳錯誤嘅問題,絕對係考驗參加者無比耐性的必然之選⋯⋯

建基百載攝影馬拉松 Competitors

Name
Duet, Salford Quays
Residents Concierge App
Kongsolo 香港著數優惠 Jetso Share
SpicyBananaOil
手機會員卡
N/A
手機會員卡
K.SUMMIT
峻瀅
This is Cynthia
Lazy - 家居接單版
HUMA by AXA
Car4HK

建基百載攝影馬拉松 Installs

Last 30 days

建基百載攝影馬拉松 Revenue

Last 30 days

建基百載攝影馬拉松 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 建基百載攝影馬拉松 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Lifestyle
Languages
English
Recent release
1.0.1 (4 years ago )
Released on
Oct 6, 2020 (4 years ago )
Last Updated
8 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.