花都上门按摩-同城上门按摩约单平台

先享后付服务完成后扣费

Description

花都平台是中国领先的
同城上门服务平台,汇聚上门推拿按摩SPA,小儿上门推拿,中医推拿,保健理疗等品类,为苹果手机用户提供高价值更优惠的养生保健体验,一键预约,轻松体验,花都app,现已覆盖北京,上海,南京,无锡,苏州,深圳,广州,重庆,杭州等多个城市,服务于上门推拿按摩垂直领域。千万用户信赖,好评如潮,用花都多一份保障,多一份舒适,多一份优惠,你累了吗?花都一点.轻松到家。
【平台优势】
1、平台担保:平台担保交易,资金和人身安全有保障
2、收费合理:价格透明,明码标价,全程无额外费用
3、爽约包赔:商家或技师原因爽约,无理由全额退款
4、认证商家:平台精选优质服务商,服务质量有保证
5、认证技师:所有技师通过头像认证,通过真人实拍,人脸识别,人脸比对
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

花都上门按摩 FAQ

  • Is 花都上门按摩 free?

    Yes, 花都上门按摩 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 花都上门按摩 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 花都上门按摩 cost?

    花都上门按摩 is free.

  • What is 花都上门按摩 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 花都上门按摩 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

1.48 out of 5

29 ratings in China

5 star
3
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
2
1 star
24
Ratings History

花都上门按摩 Reviews

骗人的

加昕桐 on

China

骗人的 下了订单没人联系。,要先付款 ,后来我在平台退款商家一直没人确认 给商家打电话说等周一联系客服 后来在打电话就没人接了, 打客服更是奇葩 电脑语音播报完就自动挂断了

骗子

小小丑蛋哥 on

China

骗子公司

骗子骗子骗子

nianfhf on

China

像这种软件就应该删除了!骗子软件!技师与真人严重不同!而且还不退款的!大家都不要用这垃圾软件!不要上当

假的!

撸猫的武松 on

China

不接单,骗子软件!

骗人的

qula17562 on

China

骗人的,就是骗你个会员费,下单就给你取消

都是假的图片

彬彬有礼的亚怿 on

China

都是假的图片 来的都是老太婆 还不给退款 垃圾软件

骗钱的。充了钱就别想退

Linkkns on

China

呵呵,来的人难看不说,退款还不给退,骗钱的东西

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

花都上门按摩 Competitors

花都上门按摩 Installs

Last 30 days

花都上门按摩 Revenue

Last 30 days

花都上门按摩 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 花都上门按摩 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.