迷宫 - 逻辑

Published by: Avraham Shlomo Ofir
Downloads
Revenue

Description

在迷宫中有20个迷宫玩。每个级别是比较困难的。迷宫含有像一个门,这将使你在迷宫中的不同部分重新出现不同的元素。你将有按钮,将启用或禁用的迷宫部分。不像其他的迷宫游戏,因为每次你玩的水平是比较困难的,你会不会觉得无聊。迷宫是一个伟大的方式来训练你的大脑,记忆和逻辑思维能力。当你玩,你还可以享受轻松的音乐为你传递的水平。

Screenshots

迷宫 - 逻辑 FAQ

  • Is 迷宫 - 逻辑 free?

    Yes, 迷宫 - 逻辑 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 迷宫 - 逻辑 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 迷宫 - 逻辑 cost?

    迷宫 - 逻辑 is free.

  • What is 迷宫 - 逻辑 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 迷宫 - 逻辑 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.4 out of 5

10 ratings in China

5 star
7
4 star
2
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
1
Ratings History

迷宫 - 逻辑 Reviews

App doesn't have any reviews yet

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

迷宫 - 逻辑 Competitors

Name
Brain Teasers > Logic Game 88
Figure Shaper
Mini Game Pack
Labyrinth 3D Maze
N/A
スーパー迷路の挑戦 - 逃げる迷路
NumberSlide Classic
迷宫着色书:学习找到迷宫宝藏,为儿童免费游戏
Robot Shooting War

迷宫 - 逻辑 Installs

Last 30 days

迷宫 - 逻辑 Revenue

Last 30 days

迷宫 - 逻辑 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 迷宫 - 逻辑 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Games
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek (modern), Hebrew (modern), Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian Bokmål, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Chinese, Turkish, Vietnamese
Recent release
2.0 (2 years ago )
Released on
Apr 11, 2016 (8 years ago )
Last Updated
1 week ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.