Apple App Store 程序员面试宝典 icon

程序员面试宝典

离线浏览免流量

Published by: 著显 朱

Description

总之资料很强大很丰富
收集 c/c++ NET c# java iPhone php
SQL 算法 数据结构 方面的面试题目
包括各大公司的面试题目和答案分析
熟读这个一般进大公司不再是什么问题
可以帮助你提升自己,找一份更好的工作
在校学生也可以看看,到底企业需要怎样的人才

In-Apps

购买公务员面试资料
¥8.00

Screenshots

程序员面试宝典 FAQ

  • Is 程序员面试宝典 free?

    Yes, 程序员面试宝典 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 程序员面试宝典 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 程序员面试宝典 cost?

    程序员面试宝典 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥8.00.

  • What is 程序员面试宝典 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 程序员面试宝典 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

China
User Rating

1 out of 5

7 ratings in China

5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
7
Ratings History

程序员面试宝典 Reviews

垃圾

大腿骨关乎 on

China

就他妈是个垃圾,无线弹广告!!垃圾人就只能做垃圾产品,丢程序员的脸!

这软件就是标题党

Tomasmile on

China

做的太烂,还无限弹广告

垃圾

呃呃呃我以为 on

China

看会题就弹广告,果断卸载,题也垃圾只有问题没有答案,卸载

苹果对界面要求那么高,你们的APP是怎么通过审核的

雪精灵是我 on

China

这么垃圾的APP,竟然还有广告,竟然需要付费😡

垃圾软件

twh6hxag on

China

垃圾软件,要钱,弹广告,试看题是网上被人复制烂了的渣渣题,这软件就一个字烂

垃圾

42954grxj on

China

拿别人免费的东西在这收费,垃圾,想钱想疯了

内容太少

快乐的飞~ on

China

面试题分类是挺多,但是分类下面的面试题太少了吧,网上一搜都比这些多好不。

太坑爹了,要求退钱

assu10000 on

China

排版太垃圾了,没法看

超级烂

Toiklaun on

China

就这排版还收钱?从网上随便download一份都比这个好。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

程序员面试宝典 Competitors

程序员面试宝典 Installs

Last 30 days

程序员面试宝典 Revenue

Last 30 days

程序员面试宝典 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 程序员面试宝典 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.