学信网

核实报告真伪(成绩、学籍、学历)

Description

学籍/学历/学位查询、毕业证书查询、学历/学位认证、学籍/学历/学位在线验证报告

Screenshots

学信网 FAQ

  • Is 学信网 free?

    Yes, 学信网 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 学信网 legit?

    ⚠️ The 学信网 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 学信网 cost?

    学信网 is free.

  • What is 学信网 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 学信网 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.31 out of 5

688 ratings in Hong Kong SAR China

5 star
550
4 star
19
3 star
4
2 star
9
1 star
106
Ratings History

学信网 Reviews

垃圾

经典歌曲,永恒的岁月。 on

Hong Kong SAR China

真做不明白就别做了

废物玩意

=-= (? on

Hong Kong SAR China

垃圾软件 非要填写学校名称写了还不对 我都扫完人脸了还不能证明我是我

做的非常烂

奋斗st on

Hong Kong SAR China

客服电话不通,老说操作频繁不能登陆

除了制造麻烦之外一无是处

Viento Wang on

Hong Kong SAR China

花着老百姓的钱,教育部就养了这么一帮玩意。你告诉我,这里头有什么是零成本的网页做不到的?

傻子软件,人脸弱势识别不了

流魂漪岳 on

Hong Kong SAR China

软件识别人脸识别不了

想注销账号,但每次都闪退,垃圾

楊培鐸 on

Hong Kong SAR China

闪退

I love it

Nlodhbd on

Hong Kong SAR China

Because it is stupid app

无语

柏木英里~ on

Hong Kong SAR China

绷不住了 这怎么还要nm再下载app然后再审核

强行要求下载

biunubiunu on

Hong Kong SAR China

以前网站登录好好的,现在不下载app就不给登录,面部识别一条龙。现在获取个人数据的方式就是上供更多个人数据吗?垃圾玩意儿

做的什么垃圾玩意儿?

大树🌳…… on

Hong Kong SAR China

业务逻辑混乱,单位要求学历证明,学信网要求下载app完成身份认证,下载之后app认证无法打开人脸识别功能……真是无力吐槽,研发经费都喂了狗吗?真是废物一群

Store Rankings

Ranking History
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
1
Top Free
9
Top Free
15
Top Free
75
Top Free
138

Keywords

学信网 Competitors

学信网 Installs

Last 30 days

学信网 Revenue

Last 30 days

学信网 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 学信网 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.