App is temporarily unavailable

皇爵娛樂城

最公平的麻將娛樂城

Published by: Unknown
Downloads
Revenue

Description

正宗台灣16張麻將,邀請牌咖,進行即刻對戰!
桌上語音對談,橫跨地區時間,線上聊天室糾牌咖最方便!
線上真人即時配桌打牌,讓你走到哪打到哪,空閒時間不無聊
好友糾咖苦於沒有場地無法開桌嗎?
房卡廳讓你想打就打不怕吵到隔壁鄰居!

In-Apps

房卡包 - 13
$70.00
房卡包 - 45
$230.00
房卡包 - 108
$530.00
超值禮包 - 1
$330.00
鑽石包 - 7000
$100.00
鑽石包 - 70000
$990.00
鑽石包 - 220000
$2,990.00

Screenshots

皇爵娛樂城 FAQ

  • Is 皇爵娛樂城 free?

    Yes, 皇爵娛樂城 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 皇爵娛樂城 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 皇爵娛樂城 cost?

    皇爵娛樂城 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 321.86 $.

  • What is 皇爵娛樂城 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 皇爵娛樂城 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3.94 out of 5

379 ratings in Taiwan

5 star
265
4 star
11
3 star
8
2 star
6
1 star
89
Ratings History

皇爵娛樂城 Reviews

App doesn't have any reviews yet

皇爵娛樂城 Competitors

Name
星雲歡樂城-麻將撲克老虎機 道地玩法任你玩
加入俱樂部體驗更多專屬棋牌遊戲
錢街Online
楊繡惠推薦最敢開的線上娛樂城
歡樂開局
綠色純休閒 暢玩新體驗
國粹天天樂-台灣麻將四隻刀13支德州撲克
台灣本土最夯娛樂平台-雀神麻將、撲克、機台、射龍門遊戲合集
妞妞撲克
鳳梨歡樂城
聚合各類大眾喜聞樂見的休閒遊戲,包括妞妞、十點半等玩法!
老子有錢
超高倍數 持續突破。機台種類最齊全
開心鬥一番-麻將、撲克任你玩
各類本土麻將、撲克、老虎機遊戲,隨時隨地約牌咖
大頭家娛樂城 - 週週上新機
角子機 SLOT 麻將 捕魚 百家樂 妞妞

皇爵娛樂城 Installs

Last 30 days

皇爵娛樂城 Revenue

Last 30 days

皇爵娛樂城 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 皇爵娛樂城 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Games
Publisher
Unknown
Languages
English
Recent release
8.1.0 (1 year ago )
Released on
Jun 8, 2020 (4 years ago )
Also available in
Taiwan
Last Updated
1 year ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.