BBC: World News & Stories

Live, Breaking, Sport & Video

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

BBC: World News & Stories FAQ

  • Is BBC: World News & Stories free?

    Yes, BBC: World News & Stories is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is BBC: World News & Stories legit?

    ⚠️ The BBC: World News & Stories app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does BBC: World News & Stories cost?

    BBC: World News & Stories is free.

  • What is BBC: World News & Stories revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of BBC: World News & Stories app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.6 out of 5

91 ratings in Kazakhstan

5 star
73
4 star
10
3 star
2
2 star
2
1 star
4
Ratings History

BBC: World News & Stories Reviews

Dark mode

Permanent user of this app on

Kazakhstan

When do you add “dark mode”? I have been waiting for it for long time

About programs

Yerbol.zhar on

Kazakhstan

Good

My opinion

They'vebuingooow on

Kazakhstan

BBC news you're the best 💟

Cool, but...

orfo98 on

Kazakhstan

You talk about support for the Russian language. How to switch from English to Russian?

Great design!

Ferrumlan on

Kazakhstan

Thank you, really great design!

Not able to use on iPhone 6plus

hisjseund on

United States

Hi I’ve been listening to BBC with my iPhone 6plus for many years. But recently after you updated the app, I could not use it anymore. The BBC app simply keeps freezing and I have to shut it down each time. Can you make your app usable for older version of iOS like before? Please!!!

Unprecedentedly Left

Bob...---... on

United States

I wanted good journalism not OpEds

Not friendly

FAHAD TSNB on

United States

In todays world it’s not acceptable that a News App does not permit you to select text or word to have it spoken by the device or having the meaning checked using the dictionary. That is just simply unacceptable.

Update great, with on caveat

Meandmymiend on

United States

Hello - have to say the new updated app is overall great and a huge improvement. One request is to have the app respond to swipes like most apps do: where you can swipe back to go to the previous page. It’s a little tedious to go to the top of the article and hit a very small button to go to previous page- this would make it much more intuitive and enjoyable. Thanks for the update!

Update is major downgrade

Credulouskeptic on

United States

The new format of the BBC app, despite my long efforts to find them, shows no improvements over the old one. It is worse. Much worse. And yes I did register, hoping an account might help. — The news feed cannot be customized to interests and the algorithm (both in the “All” and the “News” tabs) seems to feed me more items that don’t interest me, often veering away from serious international news items and into social-media type dross. I’d prefer to read about serious news, from skilled & intelligent journalists than be fed videos of people narrowly avoiding being hit by crane parts (isn’t that what Reddit is for?) This is not to say I dislike the lighter stuff and the regional stuff that BBC used to feature - I enjoyed some of those but I find a lot of that gone too, in favor of the same bland mix seen on FB or other platforms. The material on the BBC app no longer seems to come from the UK but from some content aggregator somewhere. There’s a lot of repetition and less breadth and less depth. — It is harder to find the good analyses that used to accompany the serious news items. There are (were?) BBC staff who do great work in contextualizing news. (Did Anthony Zeurcher et al all resign?) I used to like those additions to many of the articles I read. They’re probably not gone, but very very reduced and hard to find. Or maybe, those folks were simply fired - that’s kind of what this new app version suggests in its general turn away from serious reporting. — the app is more focused on video than before. Video consumption of news is for people who don’t work and have time for chatty time-wasting. I prefer the serious journalism best supported in written word format, which I can scan while I’m on hold or in other situations where video/audio is inappropriate. Also, I can scan or read a long article in half the time your silly videos take to drone on, in which they contain a fraction of the amount of actual information. The bottom has an option to see only video - I’d pay money for a button that excluded videos. It’s not that I never look at them, but that I never am glad that I did. Content density is too low. — The ads seem increased, longer (in videos) and more obtrusive. — The photos can no longer be selected/ opened and cannot be expanded. If I were 12 and was happy to view photos 1 inch across or else 70 and using a large desktop monitor this might be OK. One thing this change explains is the removal (or concealment?) of the themed photo series that u

Store Rankings

Ranking History
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
6
Top Free
7
Top Free
11
Top Free
11
Top Free
11

Keywords

BBC: World News & Stories Competitors

Name
CNN: Breaking US & World News
Daily Headlines, Live Video
AP News
The Guardian - Live World News
Get breaking stories & sport
Al Jazeera English
Breaking News, Live Video
Euronews: Daily news & live TV
Breaking news, videos, live TV
CGTN
China Global TV Network
POLITICO
Reuters News
Unmatched global news source
BBC World Service
South China Morning Post: News
Breaking HK, China & Asia news

BBC: World News & Stories Installs

Last 30 days

BBC: World News & Stories Revenue

Last 30 days

BBC: World News & Stories Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into BBC: World News & Stories performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.