Loading...
Please wait..

In-Apps

点券648
USD 99.99
点券198
USD 29.99
点券68
USD 9.99
点券8
USD 0.99
点券328
USD 49.99
点券128
USD 19.99
点券28
USD 3.99
点券6
USD 0.99
点券258
USD 39.99
98点券
USD 14.99

Screenshots

FAQ

  • Is 经典捕鱼 free?

    Yes, 经典捕鱼 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 经典捕鱼 legit?

    🤔 The 经典捕鱼 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 经典捕鱼 cost?

    经典捕鱼 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is USD 27.09.

  • What is 经典捕鱼 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 经典捕鱼 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Uruguay yet.
Ratings History

Reviews

这次更新一堆Bug,boss加了护甲打不死,客服也不理人,

粗分和法国 on

China

这次更新一堆Bug,boss加了护甲打不死,客服也不理人

垃圾游戏,出BuG不给处理!

哭泣狐 on

China

出现BUG不给处理,我还有110多亿金币,进房间就显示为0金币!找客服客服不处理!垃圾游戏!

策划能不能增加捕鱼争霸玩法

013556 on

China

策划能不能增加捕鱼争霸玩法,类似于以前的腾讯欢乐捕鱼,希望策划能看到,还有游戏的炮倍材料对微氪和零氪玩家很不友好,希望策划改进一下炮倍,增加新的玩法,能增加捕鱼争霸玩法的话,我相信,这游戏会大火。

捕鱼

爆爆爆爆爆金币 on

China

还不错,值得一玩

体验感差

小鲁班kk on

China

玩个游戏而已,要不停的充值。不充值就像打石头一样。这样的游戏都要放出来。

这游戏充钱才能玩,而且要天天充,不充就不要下载了

充钱游戏,不要玩 on

China

这游戏充钱才能玩,而且要天天充,不充钱根本玩不了

太坑

找茬游戏怎么 on

China

好垃圾

单机还要联网。。。。。。。

游戏达人积分微博控 on

China

。。。。

垃圾

kkdurh on

China

垃圾

意见反馈

15635163 on

China

看得到别人打鱼打下符石,为什么我从没打到过

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Competitors

经典捕鱼 Installs

Last 30 days

经典捕鱼 Revenue

Last 30 days

Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 经典捕鱼 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.