五子棋-双人对战版

精品休闲游戏推荐

Published by: 欢 饶

Description

五子棋是一种两人对弈的纯策略型棋类游戏,通常双方分别使用黑白两色的棋子,下在棋盘直线与横线的交叉点上,先形成5子连线者获胜。
五子棋棋具与围棋通用,起源于中国上古时代的传统黑白棋种之一。主要流行于华人和汉字文化圈的国家以及欧美一些地区,是世界上最古老的棋。
五子棋容易上手,老少皆宜,而且趣味横生,引人入胜;不仅能增强思维能力,提高智力,而且富含哲理,有助于修身养性。
五子棋,日文亦有“连五子、五子连、串珠、五目、五目碰、五格、五石、五法、五联、京棋”等多种称谓,英文则称为“FIR (Five In A Row的缩写), Gomoku, Gobang, connect 5, mo-rphion. 捷克语piskvorky,韩语omok
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

五子棋-双人对战版 FAQ

  • Is 五子棋-双人对战版 free?

    Yes, 五子棋-双人对战版 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 五子棋-双人对战版 legit?

    ‼️️ The 五子棋-双人对战版 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 五子棋-双人对战版 cost?

    五子棋-双人对战版 is free.

  • What is 五子棋-双人对战版 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 五子棋-双人对战版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3.67 out of 5

399 ratings in China

5 star
209
4 star
50
3 star
25
2 star
28
1 star
87
Ratings History

五子棋-双人对战版 Reviews

好难

dajdd on

China

0

好好玩,就是广告太多了。

恶魔之姜 on

China

这一个五子棋非常的好玩,建议大家去玩。就是广告太多了,希望设计师能把这一个缺点改进一下。

NRD209 on

China

太差了

emmm

卡片行者 on

China

开始玩一局,叫我录。录不了,应该怎么录呢?

太难了

嘉年华小汐 on

China

太难了

五子棋

g g jhhhh on

China

广告太多了

广告多,太难了

yyr5864 on

China

那人机也太难了,刚玩完一局就来了个拼夕夕

🐔

毁心。 on

China

人🐔太难了……

黑子怎么是黑色的?

PatrickZ84 on

China

为什么白子是白色?黑子是黑色质量问题做得这么差

哈尔滨

孔设计符合淡化的办吧百度百度吧百度百度荷花淡化的吧百度吧 on

China

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

五子棋-双人对战版 Installs

Last 30 days

五子棋-双人对战版 Revenue

Last 30 days

五子棋-双人对战版 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 五子棋-双人对战版 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.