The Economist! My Reference!
The Economist has been my best global politic reference source for close to three decades. I dont think that would change anytime sooner!
Yes, Gold Coin Shooter Tank-Simulator is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.
🤔 The Gold Coin Shooter Tank-Simulator app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.
Gold Coin Shooter Tank-Simulator has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 87,583.33 ₦.
To get estimated revenue of Gold Coin Shooter Tank-Simulator app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
4.74 out of 5
207 ratings in Nigeria
The Economist has been my best global politic reference source for close to three decades. I dont think that would change anytime sooner!
I do not recommend. I started following the economist as a young adult and after many years I can tell you they have an agenda. There trick is what they leave out in their analysis and what they make light of. Beautiful writing riddled with propaganda. Will discontinue from today. I feel extremely disappointed and let down.
Investigative journalism at its best
The latest update appears unfinished. The app is not opening on iOS devices.
It provides detailed analysis of world economics.
So frustrated with all the feature regressions in the new app.
The magazine is wonderful. The app used to be too. But the new version doesn’t allow you to read an issue linearly - it prompts you to jump around. Downloaded content disappears making offline access problematic. And it’s hard to know which articles you’ve read. Please go back to the old version.
The Economist doesn’t need my endorsement of the quality of their journalism. It speaks for itself. Rather, I’ll comment that their app is wellAdesigned and refreshing to use. Their developers have made large leaps in the past several years to make the interface less buggy and more focused. I love being able to easily download entire editions, listen to articles with real narrators, and search for past articles. I have no complaints. Some uses complain of the ads, but I’d encourage you to hold your criticism. Media companies cannot survive on subscription fees alone—that’s been largely true since their inception. I suppose that makes me an ad-apologist, but if these ads enable the high-quality journalism we all love, then I feel we should grin and bear the ads. And for what it’s worth, I’ve never found the ads to be particularly distracting.
First it has no memory: I am unable to resume reading from where I left: when I switch or walk away from an article and come back, it resets to main window. Yes I remember what I was reading earlier today but it is annoying to refind from main window. This app is supposed to be the reader of the newspaper. Second, the audio option has many bugs: e.g: you can’t even see the queue. You say “clear the queue” but it does not. When you build audio queue the sequence from the newspaper is not followed (US section should not begin with Lexington column). I did stick with the Legacy app-was much better- and the Apple Podcast option (no longer available). It sounds like this app developer never finished the project since at least 3 years…
Nothing against the content, it’s good, but the app testing experience is not becoming of the publication’s reputation. No guidance, no feedback, and no thanks. What was I supposed to look at? No idea. Was any of the bugs or commentary I submitted appreciated? Clearly not. Will I be doing this again? Nope. This is not how one should treat users who volunteer to help
Chart
|
Category
|
Rank
|
---|---|---|
Top Grossing
|
|
1
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|