Spike is 140”?
The app really said a 15 inch spike was a 140” deer. You can look at it and see that it’s not close to 20 inch’s
Ja, RoughScore ist komplett kostenlos und enthält keine In-App-Käufe oder Abonnements.
Nicht genügend Bewertungen, um eine zuverlässige Einschätzung vorzunehmen. Die App benötigt mehr Nutzerfeedback.
RoughScore ist kostenlos.
Um geschätzte Einnahmen der RoughScore-App und weitere AppStore-Einblicke zu erhalten, können Sie sich bei der AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform anmelden.
The app really said a 15 inch spike was a 140” deer. You can look at it and see that it’s not close to 20 inch’s
I assumed the photo scoring wouldn’t work, and all reviews say it doesn’t, but I only needed the manual scoring. It only scores in whole numbers so it’s useless. A score is in x/8ths so it’s impossible to calculate. The decimal button didn’t even work so couldn’t do it that way either.
I tested it with a few different bunks on the internet and it was way off. Full frontal pictures with very little interference. I’m going to score my personal buck tomorrow and see how close it was. I’ll update my review if it’s close.
Gave a rough score as expected
Uploaded a picture of a muley buck and it scored it as 140. That was lower than I expected so I used a picture of a muley doe and and a pronghorn buck. All came back 140.
scores everything @140
I tested this on a picture of a buck that was 150” and it said “110” or lower”, then on a picture of a buck that was 115” and it said “140”.
Tested it with two deer that had a confirmed B&C score and it rated both at 110 or under when they were actually 276 and 180.
Tested it with some deer I knew the score of one was a 200+ and other less than 120 and it scored the 200+ as less than 110 and the 120 at 160 good idea but needs work