臺灣麻將16張

16張麻將單機版

Downloads
Revenue

Description

臺灣麻將16張采用十六支麻將玩法,總共144張麻將牌(包括松、蘭、竹、菊及春、夏、秋、冬八張花牌),可以吃/碰/杠/聽。
遊戲特色:
完全免費;
10個電腦對手選擇;
出色的電腦人工智能;
傳統風味的遊戲界面;
真人語音效果。

Screenshots

臺灣麻將16張 FAQ

  • Is 臺灣麻將16張 free?

    Yes, 臺灣麻將16張 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 臺灣麻將16張 legit?

    ⚠️ The 臺灣麻將16張 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 臺灣麻將16張 cost?

    臺灣麻將16張 is free.

  • What is 臺灣麻將16張 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 臺灣麻將16張 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Brunei yet.
Ratings History

臺灣麻將16張 Reviews

爛遊戲!電腦聯合作牌!

朱鈞宇 on

Taiwan

每次都拿不到自己要的牌,對面開局一下下就都聽牌,一聽牌電腦直接放槍讓另一個電腦贏,有時好不容易開局一手好牌,結果電腦丟啥另一個電腦就碰、吃啥,玩到後面電腦直接胡,我這一手好牌愣是一個都沒打出去

Bug

Enta168 on

Taiwan

有bug,當遇糊不糊,自摸時無法接受自摸

一堆遊客丟了又吃 吃了又丟 機器人嗎?大師場也一樣 這不是台灣麻將 順序計台都不對 !

Amigo⋯⋯ on

Taiwan

如上

蒼天岳凡 on

Taiwan

聯合做牌 還要靠你們方法打才會贏 一點都不真實 根本超爛

有夠SB

我勒9453 on

Taiwan

三個電腦聯合做牌,互相喂牌好幾次打不到5張牌三家全聽了,北七

2意見

幸齡人 on

Taiwan

1 年長者打牌總希望牌大一點看得清楚。它好玩又逼真 美中不足。希望 牌有增大空間 2 結束時倒牌停留時間長點。看看

遊戲沒聲音

lihowang on

Taiwan

有時候有、有時候又沒有、希望改進

超蝦

333333。。。 on

Taiwan

最好是打什麼下家都可以吃啦,每局摸兩張牌就可以聽牌,合理嗎????除了玩家以外的三家都會互相餵牌,這種設計完全不合理

被遊戲搞到想去拜拜 on

Taiwan

為什麼遊戲會出現四個人一起打出西風而且在西風句的第一場這種事,我不知道是系統還是真人但是這種事真的太不吉利了吧搞什麼啊?

作弊遊戲

拒絕下載過多廣告 on

Taiwan

很爛不要下載

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

臺灣麻將16張 Installs

Last 30 days

臺灣麻將16張 Revenue

Last 30 days

臺灣麻將16張 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 臺灣麻將16張 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.