社会工作者2025-官方最新版大纲

Published by: 竹音 李

Description

社会工作者2025-官方最新版大纲是一款最新版社工专用考试题库,根据官方考纲考点设计,专门适用于备注,宝妈在职党学生党等备考刷题学习,我们包含以下经典功能:
1. 真题再现:历年真题均具备深度专业解析,关注真题接近考题
2. 章节练习:根据每年考纲及教材章节、知识点,精编试题,夯实基础
3. 学习报告:智能化学习报告,专项学习提升,事半功倍,错题专业解析
4. 精简高频:少刷题,刷好题,多得分,做一道题,会一类题,请看我们高频题库
请大家坚持刷题,坚持学习,祝社会工作者考试题库学员都能保持初心,把握技巧,轻松上岸~
会员订阅说明:
-订阅周期:月会员,年会员以及两年会员
-付款:用户付款记入iTunes账户
-取消订阅:如需取消订阅,请在当前订阅到期24小时以前,手动到在Apple ID设置管理中关闭自动订阅
-续订:苹果iTunes账户会在到期前24小时内扣款,扣款成功后订阅周期将延续一个周
隐私政策:https://www.freeprivacypolicy.com/live/355ff000-70ff-40c8-8cc5-f0384af83544
用户协议:https://www.freeprivacypolicy.com/live/2418a099-bd41-465d-aa5e-5757abbdd211
Hide Show More...

In-Apps

2年会员
USD 17.99
年会员
USD 11.99
月会员
USD 5.99

Screenshots

社会工作者2025 FAQ

  • Is 社会工作者2025 free?

    Yes, 社会工作者2025 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 社会工作者2025 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 社会工作者2025 cost?

    社会工作者2025 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is USD 11.99.

  • What is 社会工作者2025 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 社会工作者2025 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Uganda yet.
Ratings History

社会工作者2025 Reviews

自动退回到主界面

不应。 on

China

第二次用,做着题呢,老是自动退回到主界面,咋解决呢

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

社会工作者2025 Competitors

社会工作者2025 Installs

Last 30 days

社会工作者2025 Revenue

Last 30 days

社会工作者2025 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 社会工作者2025 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.