爛遊戲
爛透了 廣告還一堆 秒刪
App is temporarily unavailable
史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏
Published by:
XIAN YUAN LUO
Description
史上最贱的游戏，20个关卡，挑战你的智力极限！
史上最贱的游戏，一款休闲益智类的解谜游戏，以暴走漫画作为游戏剧情及背景，游戏中各种吐血和恶搞的剧情，绝对能给你带来无限的乐趣，玩法更是令人抓狂，非常考验你的思维能力哦！
史上最贱的游戏，一款休闲益智类的解谜游戏，以暴走漫画作为游戏剧情及背景，游戏中各种吐血和恶搞的剧情，绝对能给你带来无限的乐趣，玩法更是令人抓狂，非常考验你的思维能力哦！
In-Apps
- 5 hints
- €0.99
- 12 hints
- €1.99
- Remove Ads
- €0.99
史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 FAQ
-
Is 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 free?
Yes, 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.
-
Is 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 legit?
‼️️ The 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.
Thanks for the vote -
How much does 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 cost?
史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is €1.32.
-
What is 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 revenue?
To get estimated revenue of 史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
4 out of 5
1 ratings in France
5 star
0
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Ratings History
史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 Reviews
Keywords
史上最賤的遊戲5：最坑爹的解謎益智遊戲 Installs
Last 30 days
史上最賤的遊戲5：最坑爹的解謎益智遊戲 Revenue
Last 30 days史上最贱的游戏5：最坑爹的解谜益智游戏 Revenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into 史上最賤的遊戲5：最坑爹的解謎益智遊戲 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
App Info
- Category
- Games
- Publisher
- XIAN YUAN LUO
- Languages
- Spanish, German, Czech, Chinese, Korean, French, English, Italian, Japanese, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Turkish
- Recent release
- 1.0.5 (8 years ago )
- Released on
- Oct 19, 2014 (10 years ago )
- Last Updated
- 3 hours ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.