快狗打车(原58速运)-拉货搬家运东西

车型全上门快价格低

Description

Order your breakfast, lunch, and dinner today. Panini, Subs, Soups, Salads, Burgers, Wraps, and freshly baked bread FREE Delivery. Easy Online Ordering

Screenshots

快狗打车(原58速运) FAQ

  • Is 快狗打车(原58速运) free?

    Yes, 快狗打车(原58速运) is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 快狗打车(原58速运) legit?

    ⚠️ The 快狗打车(原58速运) app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 快狗打车(原58速运) cost?

    快狗打车(原58速运) is free.

  • What is 快狗打车(原58速运) revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 快狗打车(原58速运) app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Lebanon yet.
Ratings History

快狗打车(原58速运) Reviews

发票漏洞

艸你那 on

China

发票必须勾选承运服务才能开。不然就开不了。

太不人性化了

还不错 挺好用。 on

China

注销了 就不能再注册了 得改善一下

差评!!!

休闲解闷游戏 on

China

差评,叫个车贼难!!!

垃圾 app

焰、 on

China

真是垃圾中的垃圾,派单 5 公里多,等了半个小时,司机到了现场,就一点东西跟我说要装卸费,没用过比这个还垃圾的软件了。

好👍

我了我现在在提醒我 on

China

很好

垃圾,没有车打什么10秒接单

秋风贝塔 on

China

垃圾,没有车接单打广告10秒接单,纯诈骗

搬家行业现在还没有人监管了吗?

Donnydong on

China

现在2公里的距离,一个人的物品,起步价400元,一个电钢琴要额外+50块钱,一个超过1.3米的床垫要加50块钱,请问哪一个成年人用这么小的床垫。你们是不是太离谱了?希望监管能管管这个行业。

要我加钱

我不是笨狼 on

China

垃圾司机要我加钱,半天找不到路垃圾死了

垃圾平台

岳东晓 on

China

司机现场涨价,客服不管,真恶心

司机更换车型,平台包庇司机,用户体验极差

Niye123 on

China

司机更换车型,平台包庇司机,用户体验极差,一星都不想给,差评!!!

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
311

Keywords

快狗打车(原58速运) Competitors

快狗打车(原58速运) Installs

Last 30 days

快狗打车(原58速运) Revenue

Last 30 days

快狗打车(原58速运) Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 快狗打车(原58速运) performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.