Published by:
珞雯 岳
Description
本App是一款专为社会工作者考生提供听课刷题一体化的备考App！
精心收录初中级社会工作者资格考试试题，覆盖社会工作实务、社会工作综合能力等科目内容，且题库内容实时更新，以完善2023年试题，考生可充分利用碎片时间移动式学习，效率备考社工！
主要特点：
超全题库：2023年精选社工专业试题，汇集高频考点和高频易错点；配合历年真题，把握命题方向；更有考点集锦，模拟试题，检验学习成果。
视频解析：2023年强师精讲课，同步初中高级社会工作者官方教材，从基础抓起，更有视频解析题目，以题带点，备考更轻松。
随时随地：随时随地，想学即学，满足碎片化的场景需求，上下班、乘车带娃。
实时更新：社会工作者报考咨讯、行业动态、备考干货、题库内容等及时更新，实时推荐。
个性化服务：多样化辅导班次，满足不同学员需求。
Hide
Show More...
精心收录初中级社会工作者资格考试试题，覆盖社会工作实务、社会工作综合能力等科目内容，且题库内容实时更新，以完善2023年试题，考生可充分利用碎片时间移动式学习，效率备考社工！
主要特点：
超全题库：2023年精选社工专业试题，汇集高频考点和高频易错点；配合历年真题，把握命题方向；更有考点集锦，模拟试题，检验学习成果。
视频解析：2023年强师精讲课，同步初中高级社会工作者官方教材，从基础抓起，更有视频解析题目，以题带点，备考更轻松。
随时随地：随时随地，想学即学，满足碎片化的场景需求，上下班、乘车带娃。
实时更新：社会工作者报考咨讯、行业动态、备考干货、题库内容等及时更新，实时推荐。
个性化服务：多样化辅导班次，满足不同学员需求。
In-Apps
- 6学贝
- 1.10 ￦
- 30学贝
- 5.50 ￦
- 50学贝
- 9.90 ￦
- 108学贝
- 22.00 ￦
- 308学贝
- 66.00 ￦
- 518学贝
- 99.00 ￦
FAQ
-
Is 社会工作者准题库 free?
Yes, 社会工作者准题库 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.
-
Is 社会工作者准题库 legit?
Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.
Thanks for the vote -
How much does 社会工作者准题库 cost?
社会工作者准题库 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 33.92 ￦.
-
What is 社会工作者准题库 revenue?
To get estimated revenue of 社会工作者准题库 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
App is not rated in South Korea yet.
Ratings History
Reviews
No Reviews in South Korea
App doesn't have any reviews in South Korea yet.
Competitors
社会工作者准题库 Installs
Last 30 days
社会工作者准题库 Revenue
Last 30 daysRevenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into 社会工作者准题库 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.