成语词典简体专业版

Published by: 隆军 刘
Downloads
Revenue

Description

从此出口成章!
成语词典专业版
1. 专业版含有书证、辨识、用法等更多內容。
2. 共收录成语二万二千余条,其中正文条目五千余条,余为附录条目。
3. 每条成语包括释义、出处、拼音、参考词、近义词、反义词等内容。
4. 正文条目更包含内容非常丰富的典源及典源说明。
5. 支持汉字、通配符号?、拼音首字母搜索。
6. 不用连上网络,随时随地使用。
-- 搜索范例:
1. 搜索「不」,会找出所有包含不字的词条。
2. 搜索「天?」,会找出所有以天字开头的词条,搜索「?天」,会找出所有以天字结尾的词条。
3. 搜索「不?不?」,会找出所有具有「不...不...」结构的词条。
4. 搜索字母「t」,会找出首个汉字声母为t的词条。
5. 搜索字母「sqsm」,会找出成语「十全十美」。
成语是汉语语言的结晶,蕴含了古人的人生哲学、生命智慧。学好成语,传承华夏文明,是我们当代人的责任。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

成语词典简体专业版 FAQ

  • Is 成语词典简体专业版 free?

    成语词典简体专业版 is not free (it costs 3.99), however it doesn't contain in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 成语词典简体专业版 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 成语词典简体专业版 cost?

    The price of 成语词典简体专业版 is 3.99.

  • What is 成语词典简体专业版 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 成语词典简体专业版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Brunei yet.
Ratings History

成语词典简体专业版 Reviews

收录的成语少

荒野橡树 on

China

收录词汇少,“针砭时弊”这样的成语都找不到。不如免费的百度汉语,后者还有读音。用心不够。 收录的成语太少了!查不到的很多!怎么好意思去卖呢!?

说实话不怎样

爱学习的飞天猪 on

China

评论不能发图,让我很心碎。我之前下了一个成语词典普通版,有释义、出处、举例、相关的成语故事。看到这个专业版详情里面写的很厉害,很详细,没忍住花了12大洋买了,用起来真心不怎样,只有一个解释加示例,然后把几个字加大放在米字格里面,你以为就值这12大洋了吗?👿👿望改进

最好的成语词典

顾白杨 on

China

收录成语多,不但有详细的释义,而且还有丰富的典源、典源说明、书证、辨识等内容,值得下载。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
268
Top Paid
312
Top Paid
379

成语词典简体专业版 Installs

Last 30 days

成语词典简体专业版 Revenue

Last 30 days

成语词典简体专业版 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 成语词典简体专业版 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.