浦发银行收银宝(官方版)

Downloads
Revenue

Description

浦发银行MPOS移动收单产品,作为一款新推出的创新收单终端,是将传统POS功能与智能移动设备APP应用相结合,可受理刷卡消费、电子现金闪付等多种交易,具有“更低费用、便捷收款、资金安全、智能体验”等优势。
1、“更低费用”,相比传统POS最为经济,帮助商户降低通讯费用、签购单等成本费用;
2、“便捷收款”,随时随地收款,便捷高效;
3、“资金安全”,浦发银行负责资金清算,收款资金全程有保障;
4、“智能体验”,畅连智能终端,交易信息实时查询,交易凭证电子化。

Screenshots

浦发银行收银宝(官方版) FAQ

  • Is 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) free?

    Yes, 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) cost?

    浦发银行收银宝(官方版) is free.

  • What is 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Indonesia yet.
Ratings History

浦发银行收银宝(官方版) Reviews

苹果手机用不了

solar pop on

China

打开白屏,用不了

太落后

费yang on

China

学学wx收款助手,做的非常落后简单而且时不时卡顿

苹果手机打不开

shxjcjdbwja on

China

真不好用

登不进去

rty157 on

China

苹果手机为什么登不进去,现在安卓手机能用,苹果手机用不了

垃圾到极致了

252349484616199 on

China

用的时候总是闪退,而且网络不好,总是显示正在连接,无线和流量都是一样的状态,也不是手机问题,苹果11,用其他软件都没有出现过,就这个软件,而且返回键也不灵敏,真的是垃圾,要不是用的这个银行卡,才不用这个app呢,都这个时代了,还会有这么垃圾的app,点开进去一看页面的整体就感觉不好,像是很多年以前刚有智能手机时的那种质感,体验感极差

zhaowuxiaowei on

China

窗前明月光,疑是地上霜。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

浦发银行收银宝(官方版) Competitors

Name
聚合收单
JRCB收银宝
农商行收银宝
兴业生活商户版
平安银行收银宝
招行聚合收款
商户服务平台
乐收银
中信银行全付通
浦汇O2O

浦发银行收银宝(官方版) Installs

Last 30 days

浦发银行收银宝(官方版) Revenue

Last 30 days

浦发银行收银宝(官方版) Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 浦发银行收银宝(官方版) performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.