Description

贝壳广厦是贝壳租房专为公寓运营商打造的专业公寓管理软件,在全国59个城市均有辐射,服务人员覆盖全国一二线城市。以SaaS系统为切入点,构建租房行业深度解决方案,产品贯穿从与业主收房到房源去化到租客租后服务所有链条,真正实现租房业务线上化,助力公寓运营商经营管理,盈利稳步提升,让您的房源可劲租。
产品功能:
【房源管理】:房源录入快捷简单,随时查看房源动态
【在线签约】:租客联网校验放心,合同线上存储安心
【智能记账】:收支盈亏智能计算,清晰掌握财务状况

Screenshots

贝壳广厦 FAQ

  • Is 贝壳广厦 free?

    Yes, 贝壳广厦 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 贝壳广厦 legit?

    ⚠️ The 贝壳广厦 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 贝壳广厦 cost?

    贝壳广厦 is free.

  • What is 贝壳广厦 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 贝壳广厦 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in New Zealand yet.
Ratings History

贝壳广厦 Reviews

垃圾

鹅肝酱无添加 on

China

只会扣钱的垃圾平台

非常的垃圾

飞你理解 on

China

全是人机,贝壳可能没钱花了,都是已读不回,水军远远大于客户的体量,太夸张了

全是假咨询,2000充进去两天就用完,一个真人来咨询都没有,

寓安咨询 on

China

消息都是秒回的然后变成未读或已读不

垃圾

54349434946464 on

China

垃圾,一堆无效商机

消息提醒真的巨差

还是听不错的 on

China

怎么会有这么差的消息提醒功能,随便一个app的消息提醒也不会这么垃圾啊,能不能优化一下啊

无效咨询太多了,申诉和举报都被驳回。太垃圾了

甚至果果 on

China

如果能给0分,就给了。

垃圾玩意

瓦萨琪96 on

China

垃圾 破垃圾玩意 坑人货

垃圾

刷个梨梨 on

China

垃圾

强制更新

盧L on

China

不更新还回复不了信息,垃圾软件

最坑的平台

188881% on

China

咨询都是无效的 真费劲,没有准确的人来

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

贝壳广厦 Competitors

Name
云图梭
ETC商户平台
经纪人房源客源自营销一手搞定
云门店-经纪人作业平台
来客宝(E来客宝)
有房 有客 有服务
智房公寓管家
一看就会用的『智能设备房源管理软件』
小泊伙伴
巴乐兔房东-管理生意的工具
蜂电智能电表
火河智能
火河智能门锁
广发屋托邦
广发租房管理平台

贝壳广厦 Installs

Last 30 days

贝壳广厦 Revenue

Last 30 days

贝壳广厦 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 贝壳广厦 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.