闪送-一对一急送

专门送您这一单,更快更安全

Description

【闪送服务】
帮你送:合同、发票、钥匙、证件
帮你取:电脑、衣服、报告、药品
帮你买:奶茶、蛋糕、火锅、鲜花
【联系我们】
官方微博:闪送
官方网站:http://www.ishansong.com
联系电话:4006126688
您的反馈对我们十分重要,如果有任何问题或建议,欢迎联系我们。

Screenshots

闪送-一对一急送 FAQ

  • Is 闪送-一对一急送 free?

    Yes, 闪送-一对一急送 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 闪送-一对一急送 legit?

    ⚠️ The 闪送-一对一急送 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 闪送-一对一急送 cost?

    闪送-一对一急送 is free.

  • What is 闪送-一对一急送 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 闪送-一对一急送 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Saudi Arabia yet.
Ratings History

闪送-一对一急送 Reviews

垃圾平台,

1/(hbvyjgdingti on

China

压榨骑手,偷时间,偷距离,不人性化,半颗星都不想给。

1284752。 on

China

不是一对一了改成一对三,不是专送

自从更新以后,没有一次下单地址能准确无误的找到,耽误了很多时间

LUlululiuzhi on

China

不去从前

无人接单

面子称 on

China

骑手经常说看见我们这儿派单就是不接

简直疯了,不到一百公里要一千多块钱

还分你牛奶 on

China

填个地址各种麻烦,废半天劲,浪费我半个小时时间,给我算要一千多运费,你咋不去抢?瞎耽误功夫,垃圾

闪送就是垃圾

跑闪送就得饿死 on

China

派单少就算了,退坑后还被平台拉黑了666

搞笑的很

胖子贝塔 on

China

客服搞笑的很 跟一家独大一样

越更新越不方便下单

灯灯的票根 on

China

0星

太坑了!另外收取各种附加费!

应天仇 on

China

一起一单平均20多,现在都要40多,要加各种附加费,溢价费、过江费、夜间费、快递通道费、服务费!关键我们加红包给闪送员基本全被闪送扣了! 而且赔付也非常差!东西损坏完全不承担责任,大家慎用

验证码填了又填一遍就是不过,垃圾软件,你不让填验证码正好没人用你这软件,赶紧倒闭

冰冷ToT on

China

倒闭软件

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
95
Top Free
309

Keywords

闪送-一对一急送 Installs

Last 30 days

闪送-一对一急送 Revenue

Last 30 days

闪送-一对一急送 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 闪送-一对一急送 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.