Downloads
Revenue

Description

畅想谷粒是一款主打教材订购的教育类APP。主要面向高等学校在校学生和教师 ,帮助其快速订购教材,便于各大高校统计信息和归档。
教材订购功能是针对于在校大学生和高校教师开发的,帮助其选择和购买实体的图书用于大学学习,此功能只是针对于线下实体教材的征订统计。

In-Apps

1个畅想币
$4,900.00
3个畅想币
$4,900.00
6个畅想币
$4,900.00
12个畅想币
$9,900.00
30个畅想币
$29,900.00
50个畅想币
$49,900.00
68个畅想币
$59,900.00
88个畅想币
$69,900.00
108个畅想币
$99,900.00

Screenshots

畅想谷粒老师 FAQ

  • Is 畅想谷粒老师 free?

    Yes, 畅想谷粒老师 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 畅想谷粒老师 legit?

    ‼️️ The 畅想谷粒老师 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 畅想谷粒老师 cost?

    畅想谷粒老师 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $37,122.22.

  • What is 畅想谷粒老师 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 畅想谷粒老师 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Colombia yet.
Ratings History

畅想谷粒老师 Reviews

如题

taikoXi on

China

垃圾软件肯定和学校某些垃圾人勾结

依托答辩。

shendaxian on

China

史。

我也想吃薯片 on

China

勾史

垃圾软件

叛逆少年女 on

China

真不知道这种软件能干嘛 浪费资源 害 体验感太差了

垃圾

回家哈哈哈家 on

China

五星分期

司马软件

快手(记录美好生活) on

China

纯纯司马了

垃圾app 圈钱勾当

hshsjajajja on

China

在这里我们欢聚一堂 庆祝又一个被学校强制下载的app来恶心人

八月今天有点丧 on

China

江浙吴彦祖 on

China

...

sis012 on

China

一分是评分的极限不是我的极限^_^

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

畅想谷粒老师 Competitors

Name
保研通 - 保研备考必备工具
保研信息|经验|数据|文书|学姐|故事全都有
知到教师版
融学
国培教务
智慧校园-学生版
青春山东
共青团山东省委移动服务总门户
知米听力-专为英语学习者定制
东北农业大学体育部
投智圈
池馆

畅想谷粒 Installs

Last 30 days

畅想谷粒 Revenue

Last 30 days

畅想谷粒老师 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 畅想谷粒 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.