Downloads
Revenue

Description

跟哥学雅思——IELTS全科备考神器
每天进步一点点,考出理想成绩!
【全套剑雅真题库】
提供剑雅正版听力阅读写作真题,含中英文翻译,随时练习、查看试题解析~
【真人1对1直播互动课】
雅思大牛直播课1对1指导,模拟真实考场环境。高效练习,快速拿高分!
【外教模考】
真人一对一模考,环节与官方一致,还可以切换外教老师,帮助你适应不同口音、语速和考试风格,高度还原考试现场;
【专属会员服务】
会员专属课程,随时随地练习听说读写,高分备考材料,7+写作范文,助你雅思分手快人一步!
【发现社区】
招生官见面会、考试资讯、学长学姐经验分享、留学申请攻略,干货满满,让你学习不孤单!
有问题有建议,欢迎随时勾搭哥。
Hide Show More...

In-Apps

写作VIP14天
349.00 ₽
写作VIP30天
599.00 ₽
写作VIP60天
999.00 ₽
口语VIP14天
349.00 ₽
口语VIP30天
599.00 ₽
口语VIP60天
999.00 ₽
录播课VIP14天
599.00 ₽
录播课VIP30天
999.00 ₽
录播课VIP60天
2,290.00 ₽
超级会员vip60天
4,990.00 ₽

Screenshots

跟哥学雅思 FAQ

  • Is 跟哥学雅思 free?

    Yes, 跟哥学雅思 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 跟哥学雅思 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 跟哥学雅思 cost?

    跟哥学雅思 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 1,277.20 ₽.

  • What is 跟哥学雅思 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 跟哥学雅思 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Russia yet.
Ratings History

跟哥学雅思 Reviews

No Reviews in Russia
App doesn't have any reviews in Russia yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

跟哥学雅思 Competitors

Name
高途雅思听力-雅思口语单词真题模拟神器
N/A
久一英语-在线外教英语口语教学
雅思真题词汇学习--雅思考试必备
英语词汇通
艾宾浩斯List背单词神器, 助力英语学习
易呗背单词-雅思专用版
疯狂英语会话书-实用版
雅思单词轻松记
雅思圣题库
python入门教程大全
去学雅思-优途国际教育
听说读写全科备考神器

跟哥学雅思 Installs

Last 30 days

跟哥学雅思 Revenue

Last 30 days

跟哥学雅思 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 跟哥学雅思 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.