App is temporarily unavailable

裁判文书-法律案例文书查询

全国判决文书、文书网司法案例查询

Published by: Unknown
Downloads
Revenue

Description

裁判文书是一款律师在线工作查询软件,支持裁判文书网司法案例、文书查询,法律法规条文查询、法院查找、庭审提醒设置,提供证据多场景、多元化取证方式。
还支持全文检索、章节索引定位查阅、听书功能、高级搜索、收藏等功能,旨在帮助学生、律师等日常学习使用,在需要查询法条、案例、文书时成为最得力的助手,让办公更高效。
用户协议:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DSlp5V1l4U0xweXVC
隐私政策:https://docs.qq.com/doc/DSlpDaEpweGFQd2dG

Screenshots

裁判文书 FAQ

  • Is 裁判文书 free?

    Yes, 裁判文书 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 裁判文书 legit?

    🤔 The 裁判文书 app seems decent. It has room for improvement but generally satisfies users.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 裁判文书 cost?

    裁判文书 is free.

  • What is 裁判文书 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 裁判文书 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Portugal yet.
Ratings History

裁判文书 Reviews

必须差评赶紧下架

nalanshenlan on

China

啥啥查不到还收费,真有你的

收费

不错水果 on

China

假的,要收费

想钱想疯了

jaronwei on

China

收钱合理,但是全部内容要充值会员后才能看就离谱了。正常法律法规这些在网上可以查到的收费干什么?差评!

骗人的

六六的古白小 on

China

啥也没有

要收费的

(😇)👉👈 on

China

好评全是刷的不要下载 一直加载中 还收费 !!!!

体验很好‎  

上海登佳★纸业王 on

China

找法律,包括修改,蛮实用的,找案例。‎  

信息也很全面   

花0臂于浩 on

China

方便查询,案例丰富,地方法规等,蛮实用的。‌  

很棒! ‏   ‎

┘一只傻火苗 on

China

找案例,真的不错,法条法规也特别全。​     ‏   

文书案例都可以检索​‌‍​ ‏

信¯具灯点亮 on

China

案例库特别丰富,功能齐全,法律条文查询。 ‌    

很有帮助   ‍  

PPaulS35 on

China

对裁判文书APP比较满意,找法院都特别好用。 ‌ ‏ ‍  

裁判文书 Installs

Last 30 days

裁判文书 Revenue

Last 30 days

裁判文书 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 裁判文书 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Publisher
Unknown
Languages
English, Chinese
Recent release
1.7 (1 year ago )
Released on
Feb 19, 2023 (1 year ago )
Last Updated
10 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.