Downloads
Revenue

Description

咪鸭课堂专注于金融财务类职业考试,提供一站式学习,陪伴您一起成长的服务理念,力求打造最优质的课程。帮助广大考生节约时间、高效备考!

In-Apps

咪鸭课堂-18元金币
EGP 99.99
咪鸭课堂-60元金币
EGP 299.99
咪鸭课堂-128元金币
EGP 699.99
咪鸭课堂-158元金币
EGP 799.99
咪鸭课堂-198元金币
EGP 999.99
咪鸭课堂-488元金币
EGP 2,499.99
咪鸭课堂-648元金币
EGP 3,499.99
咪鸭课堂-VIP无忧包过班
EGP 4,999.99
咪鸭课堂-会计职称冲刺题库
EGP 1,499.99
咪鸭课堂-黄金从业冲刺题库
EGP 1,499.99

Screenshots

咪鸭课堂 FAQ

  • Is 咪鸭课堂 free?

    Yes, 咪鸭课堂 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 咪鸭课堂 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 咪鸭课堂 cost?

    咪鸭课堂 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is EGP 1,689.99.

  • What is 咪鸭课堂 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 咪鸭课堂 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Egypt yet.
Ratings History

咪鸭课堂 Reviews

诈骗APP

Cara in UK on

China

购买课程使用时间极其短暂,需要多次重复购买,并且价格贵于其他APP数倍,工作人员态度恶劣,付款时根本没有标明使用有效期,询问时高高在上,说他们的课程题库都是一个月有效期,要用就要每个月重复购买。从来没看到过哪个APP如此厚颜无耻,200道题158元,还需要每月购买,希望大家购买时看清楚,不要再被诈骗了。

很好用的APP

hxusiww on

China

同事推荐的,考基金从业,课程很实用!

很好的一款备考软件

Tiger000111fghj on

China

同事的推荐,他用这个软件,考过了银从和基金。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

咪鸭课堂 Competitors

Name
基金从业资格对题库
基金从业资格考试真题题库
金融数据汇
乐橙网
证券基金中级经济师会计考试必备应用
基金从业随身学
2023基金从业资格考试真题证券经济师财经金融
理财教育网
CFP系列网络服务平台
金培网
优培网校
乐考网
考证必备学习平台
银行从业资格证考试题库2023新版
最新最全的历年银行考试真题库
华金教育

咪鸭课堂 Installs

Last 30 days

咪鸭课堂 Revenue

Last 30 days

咪鸭课堂 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 咪鸭课堂 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.