奥动换电

新能源汽车换电站

Published by: Aulton New Energy Co

Description

我们是新能源汽车换电服务先行者! 奥动不是一家电池公司,也不是一家汽车公司,而是一家能源公司。 奥动致力于提供绿色、环保的汽车能源,为“换出一片蓝天”而努力。我们提供专业快速换电服务。温馨提示您,GPS在后台运行可能会影响电池续航时间。

Screenshots

奥动换电 FAQ

  • Is 奥动换电 free?

    Yes, 奥动换电 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 奥动换电 legit?

    ⚠️ The 奥动换电 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 奥动换电 cost?

    奥动换电 is free.

  • What is 奥动换电 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 奥动换电 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Australia yet.
Ratings History

奥动换电 Reviews

百年长安,千年垃圾

好个锤子好 on

China

垃圾长安,堂堂国企,做些垃圾车,现在开长安车比开枫叶低十块,自己没有哈数吗,军工企业又不是没技术,只是没民品和驾驶员当个人,现在听到长安车开都不想开。开始是付款界面一直弹界面,现在直接是换电 app 弹广告,你们是没有研发资费了吗,广告弹都弹不完

太傻

源豪 on

China

就这一个司机用的换店的软件还加载出来一个游戏,还有广告,真恶心

没用

l,!, on

China

换电站天天坏天天坏,换个电等一两个小时,贵就算了,比充电还慢

刘笔

我啊啊哈呢 on

China

要倒闭么旋转进广告

不好用

游戏666 on

China

用了一年的换电,站点太少,电池数量少,经常为了换块电池跑一两个小时

垃圾

jsjsvdbdkx on

China

别买别用 真的垃圾

太贵了

1851669 on

China

还是充电便宜,换电太瘠薄贵了

垃圾中的战斗机……

long7701 on

China

垃圾中的战斗机……

闪退

♎️Alucard♎️ on

China

这次更新后一直闪退,越做越垃圾

垃圾

奥动程序员 on

China

垃圾的一比,破收费系统总怪,公司没有程序员?

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

奥动换电 Competitors

奥动换电 Installs

Last 30 days

奥动换电 Revenue

Last 30 days

奥动换电 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 奥动换电 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Lifestyle
Languages
Chinese
Recent release
6.9.23 (2 weeks ago )
Released on
Jul 1, 2017 (8 years ago )
Last Updated
2 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.