心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台

100%正品保障·假一赔三

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 FAQ

  • Is 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 free?

    Yes, 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 legit?

    ⚠️ The 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 cost?

    心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 is free.

  • What is 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Bahrain yet.
Ratings History

心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 Reviews

体验感极差

十指紧扣5200 on

China

千万别看心上 卖家卖家联系不上 客服客服联系不上 也没有电话 无语到离谱

悲哀啊 平台飘了 收取高昂手续费 现在衰落 了

余水牛 on

China

我已经三年没有在平台买卖物品了 基本所有的用户都没有发布商品了 就是因为平台收取离谱的手续费 现在吓得没有人用这个平台了。只剩下平台自营自嗨。 忘记初心的平台 终将被用户遗弃

什么商品都没有,首页也刷新不出来

id 兔子 on

China

没有任何商品,刷新不出来

打五分是让大家看到这个软件有多不好

awfgfcghgf on

China

很差,里面东西有些都烂的,而且价格不正常一个奢侈品,连最起码的服务都不好

性价比很的平台

luck_fly on

China

这是个不错的二手奢侈品平台,海量自己喜欢的物品

垃圾公司

太好了2587 on

China

垃圾

鬼影子都没有一个。服务费价格死贵

余水牛 on

China

现在95分app做的比你们好

垃圾

我浑身是胆 on

China

垃圾平台 就一直拖 一点变通都没有

骗人的根本不给退,而且都有瑕疵都不会体现

MOCCA cc on

China

骗子,还要我自己付邮费,还贱卖我的包包,召回还要服务费!过分,没这么做生意的

巨恶心人

reputation!!! on

China

卸载了 账号注销了还发短信骚扰 别恶心我了 给我整吐了

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
186

心上-二手闲置奢侈品交易服务平台 Installs

Last 30 days

心上-二手闲置奢侈品交易服务平台 Revenue

Last 30 days

心上-首创闲置二手奢侈品交易平台 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 心上-二手闲置奢侈品交易服务平台 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.