快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批

原筆跡手寫,文件審批,拍照簽字

Published by: 惟 陈

Description

快簽-功能介紹
1. 手寫電子簽名:模擬真實書寫筆跡,完美還原紙簽效果
2.拍照簽字:拍照識別手寫簽名,一鍵保存
3.文件發送:支持微信一鍵分享
4.多格式支持:支持WORD/EXCEL/PPT/PDF/圖片
5.支持文件合並/拆分/加解密/網頁轉PDF/本地保存

In-Apps

一年会员
$990.00
单年会员
$290.00
单月会员
$30.00
10次发送包
$30.00
一个月会员
$120.00

Screenshots

快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 FAQ

  • Is 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 free?

    Yes, 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 legit?

    ‼️️ The 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 cost?

    快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $292.00.

  • What is 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.94 out of 5

17 ratings in Taiwan

5 star
16
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Ratings History

快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 Reviews

7493

很棒棒棒耶 on

Taiwan

👍👍👍

很好👍

773235555555 on

Taiwan

讚👍

好用

28282妞 on

Taiwan

非常神奇,好用

greatyiyiiiii on

China

办公好帮手

付了两次钱,一共56 麻烦退一个月的钱

无1种以上 on

China

退一个月的钱

扣费了权益不能到账

童乐哥 on

China

扣费了还不能正常使用,客服也联系不上

问题

好望角北京 on

China

为什么照片传不上啊,怎么回事

这么简单的功能竟然还要收费

如意AAA on

China

bug一大堆,垃圾

免费太少

软绵绵的默多克 on

China

免费次数太少而且没有提示

有点垃圾

亚坤军控 on

China

第一次还挺好用,之后就一直不好用也上传不了文件迁移了

Store Rankings

Ranking History
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
458

Keywords

快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 Competitors

快签-文件合同手写签名审批 Installs

Last 30 days

快签-文件合同手写签名审批 Revenue

Last 30 days

快簽-文件合同手寫簽名審批 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 快签-文件合同手写签名审批 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.