Downloads
Revenue

Description

全国中小学管理服务平台客户端

Screenshots

学有优教 FAQ

  • Is 学有优教 free?

    Yes, 学有优教 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 学有优教 legit?

    ⚠️ The 学有优教 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 学有优教 cost?

    学有优教 is free.

  • What is 学有优教 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 学有优教 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in France yet.
Ratings History

学有优教 Reviews

学校强制下载

菲菲宝贝👄 on

China

呵呵

换设备就登录不上

362307090 on

China

确实是老火,换了设备就登录不上了,就提示我的信息有误,明明对着原设备信息登录的,账号密码都是对的 然而就是登不上

阿旅客上午的才是难 on

China

更新太慢了!!!!!!!!好多那些用的都用不了还给我弹一个,正在建设中快点行不行!!!!!!

😤

四季花常开 on

China

非自愿下载

过度收集家庭成员信息

🪶🪶🪶垃圾 on

China

为何现在动不动学校就让家长下载这些APP,不下载还在群里面点名😰,下载了又不见得使用,甚至有些APP就光叫下载,一点用处都没有,过度收集家庭成员信息

太烂的软件

Nono5261119 on

China

请问有没有客服,验证码发了手机根本收不到,能不能搞得能用了啊,我搞了三天了,密码改不了,登不进去

垃圾学校折腾家长,窃取信息

开拓哥哥 on

China

垃圾软件开发出来就是为了折腾家长,窃取信息的吗

垃圾无须多言

iloveglj on

China

又是个标准的垃圾app,花了国家的钱却做出这么个怪物,能不能上点心,起码找个合格点的外包商?

垃圾

一个打印机用户很生气 on

China

太垃圾了,学校提供的注册码,就是没反应进不去。

垃圾,学校强制下载.

dodomars on

China

天天开发一堆垃圾,通过公关学校强制下载..

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
115

Keywords

学有优教 Competitors

Name
班级优化大师
名师都在用的班级管理神器
状元共享课堂—小学学习好帮手
小状元读者必备的随身老师
简小知
简小知,让成长更快乐
口语易
出口成章—爱阅读,会写作!
语文同步、阅读写作 、朗读书写好帮手
外研通
外研社新标准点读配音秀
家长通
菁书在线
智慧中小学-国家中小学智慧教育平台
优质•共建•共享
八桂教学通
途途课堂-中小学作业辅导工具
作业辅导答疑在线教育app

学有优教 Installs

Last 30 days

学有优教 Revenue

Last 30 days

学有优教 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 学有优教 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.