住小橙 - 百姓安居乐业。信赖我们,让家更美好

Description

百姓安居乐业。信赖我们,让家更美好

Screenshots

住小橙 FAQ

  • Is 住小橙 free?

    Yes, 住小橙 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 住小橙 legit?

    ⚠️ The 住小橙 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 住小橙 cost?

    住小橙 is free.

  • What is 住小橙 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 住小橙 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in India yet.
Ratings History

住小橙 Reviews

垃圾 App

等会等会见 on

China

垃圾,太垃圾了,全是 bug

垃圾软件,破烂公司,坑用户坑员工

一只熊大 on

China

这款 APP 堪称垃圾!功能残缺,使用中频繁闪退,严重影响体验。背后的公司更是糟糕透顶,不仅坑骗用户,还压榨员工。更新迟缓,对用户反馈置若罔闻,毫无责任心。宣传与实际相差甚远,完全是在浪费用户的时间和精力,实在令人愤怒!

坑害员工软件

¥风流倜傥¥ on

China

里面有乐捐系统,随时罚款,已经牵涉到非法集资了,望有关部门查办!

一星

司马無 on

China

没什么用,下去沉淀沉淀吧

垃圾公司

来咯去看手机 on

China

垃圾公司,全是坑,员工被坑,客户被坑

垃圾

林北000004 on

China

垃圾系统,自娱自乐

软件打开就要罚款

看明白点进去 on

China

软件莫名其妙要你罚款各种理由罚款

Bug多,开发人员能力差

yadeqqw on

China

每次更新都是一堆bug,天天喊着数字化转型,实际上并没有提高大家的工作效率。工作还变得繁琐。app上的流程经常出现bug。企业领导人根本没有核心方向,也没人把握产品,都是乱喊口号,最后做一堆鸡肋的东西,也没提升企业的内部效率,数字化转型有是有,但是也是在一个臃肿的系统上。开发人员能力要么差,要么就是敷衍,要么就是既差又敷衍。

1

破烂百安居 on

China

垃圾软件,破烂公司,坑客户坑员工

垃圾软件

ygygjg on

China

垃圾软件,垃圾公司,工程差,管理差,业绩差!

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

住小橙 Competitors

Name
齐装云管家
D.box-为员工提供的移动办公管理工具
掌赋-装修管理ERP
家装全流程数字化管理平台
家易量
小叮当ERP
UniConnect
当家工匠-装修接单神器
达尔云
(供应链移动管理助手)
金店涨
小胖熊配送(发货单版)

住小橙 Installs

Last 30 days

住小橙 Revenue

Last 30 days

住小橙 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 住小橙 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.