Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

到家商家版 FAQ

  • Is 到家商家版 free?

    Yes, 到家商家版 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 到家商家版 legit?

    ⚠️ The 到家商家版 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 到家商家版 cost?

    到家商家版 is free.

  • What is 到家商家版 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 到家商家版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Dominican Republic yet.
Ratings History

到家商家版 Reviews

商家千万不要入驻 你不想做 保证金压根不退给你

ikunsxq on

China

拉垮到不行 找客服解决问题 3个月了得不到回复 每次追着问 当下说给我解决 然后就没了然后执行力太差 商家千万不要入驻,入驻简单 退出来难 保证金根本不给你

垃圾

72735628163573 on

China

没单,提现时间还那么长

师傅们 再接再厉 一定为每一个客户做得更好!

王工在线 on

China

再接再厉

骗子APP

呵呵4562 on

China

提现迟迟不到账 客服联系不上 根本就找不到客服入口

骗子几天一单接不到

农村小维 on

China

单都接不到,退自己保证金还要很久,太坑了

9786536 on

China

没有客服的吗

强制交费充会员电话太多

我不服气 on

China

一开始说有两种模式,滴滴模式,平台派单,平台定价,一种是淘宝模式,自己接单,自己定价,平台抽佣金,好不容易写完简介,定完价格,不加入直约不能发布,你要干嘛去了,手机一黑屏,所有写的东西全没了,好不容易写完了,你又告诉我这个,充值会员电话一天天不停,给没挣钱,先给你15000,还是你们挣钱快啊

好极了

lolinxin on

China

小伙子有潜力

收不到消息!收不到消息!收不到消息!

宁唧唧 on

China

收不到消息,请解决这个bug

没单子

dajinan on

China

没有大济南,一个单子也没有,太垃圾了

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

到家商家版 Competitors

Name
神州邦邦-专业IT服务共享平台
锐锢商城
掌上K3
售后服务派单管理系统
N/A
沪农商村镇银行(企业)
连锁-连锁行业人员学习交流的工具
神行工程师-IT工程师接单平台
58到家工作端-同城找活兼职接单
搬家维修家政服务在线接单
银盛收银台
银盛支付股份有限公司
喜见

到家商家版 Installs

Last 30 days

到家商家版 Revenue

Last 30 days

到家商家版 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 到家商家版 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.