聚法案例

最全的法律案例搜索平台

Downloads
Revenue

Description

搜案例,找聚法
聚法案例收录超过6000万篇文书,数据全面;全国首创可视化检索,直观展示数据分布情况;首家推出多区段交叉检索,大幅提高案例检索效率。
同时收录全面海量的法律法规,更新速度快;法律法规和司法案例无缝衔接,满足用户多种检索需求。

In-Apps

1年VIP
448.98 S$
2年VIP
448.98 S$
半年VIP
218.98 S$

Screenshots

聚法案例 FAQ

  • Is 聚法案例 free?

    Yes, 聚法案例 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 聚法案例 legit?

    🤔 The 聚法案例 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 聚法案例 cost?

    聚法案例 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 372.31 S$.

  • What is 聚法案例 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 聚法案例 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Singapore yet.
Ratings History

聚法案例 Reviews

太贵了

会员太贵充不起 on

China

每一步都收费,任何检索都收费

搜索就要冲钱

网络12 on

China

不冲q就用不了

网页版用不了,非让下app

1917579 on

China

用网页版一共就搜一个案例,还让我开会员下app,扫完码结果是添加微信,一年599是不是想钱想疯了

坏了

宇宇6gdw on

China

坏了 打不开

普通案例都要注册会员了吗

一片柳叶吹成舟 on

China

你不如直接收费

垃圾 注册要你各种职业证件图片还有毕业证图片。

~李如楷未来讲师~ on

China

不知道是提供服务还是盗取用户信息?!!

真的很好用

拉花fortda on

China

比起裁判文书网来说不卡 比起北大法宝类来说免费 案例全,排版合理,还有ai分析功能,有各种推荐关键词,太强大了,法律民工都给我用!

有身份的人可以用,有需要的人不给用

攻击键 on

China

资源都把控住少数人手里,这句话在这个软件上表现的淋漓精致。,必须要有身份,有职业。

good

辣味可乐 on

China

good well bang!!!

近几年起诉人数最多的三大罪之一的帮信罪居然都没有

无名乄. on

China

帮助网络信息犯罪活动罪目前是最热门的罪居然一条都查不到。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

聚法案例 Competitors

Name
北大法宝
Alpha-法律智能操作系统
华律律师端
易审
云晤
云审
英才苑府
律兴
天平发布
审判案例

聚法案例 Installs

Last 30 days

聚法案例 Revenue

Last 30 days

聚法案例 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 聚法案例 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.