Downloads
Revenue

Description

树鱼英语是一款智能学习英语的软件、内容包括习题、口语听力的练习等等。旨在,学会英语知识内容,采用游戏化的元素,提高学生的学习兴趣

In-Apps

6树鱼币
299.00 Ft
30树鱼币
1,790.00 Ft
50树鱼币
2,990.00 Ft
98树鱼币
6,990.00 Ft
138树鱼币
8,990.00 Ft
198树鱼币
12,990.00 Ft

Screenshots

树鱼英语 FAQ

  • Is 树鱼英语 free?

    Yes, 树鱼英语 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 树鱼英语 legit?

    ⚠️ The 树鱼英语 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 树鱼英语 cost?

    树鱼英语 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 5,674.83 Ft.

  • What is 树鱼英语 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 树鱼英语 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Hungary yet.
Ratings History

树鱼英语 Reviews

不错

很不爽呀呀呀 on

China

每天让孩子读15分钟,效果显著

不好

你的班主任123468 on

China

不好侠

垃圾

跑酷天才 on

China

垃圾死掉了,每月都喊我充值。功能又差又离谱。

树鱼英语老是让我们更新,不更新就用不了

三杯不劝 on

China

真的是太棒了

Very good

1155753点多 on

China

还是很不错的

Www

我刚好三个是不是那就好手机号试试就试试几号结束后 on

China

✓石

不错

婉甯麻麻 on

China

真的很不错👍

不太行

1578349154 on

China

一个小破APP天天更新,还老闪退

不错哟

我会回宿舍睡觉时十年生聚宿舍还好点我回宿舍后 on

China

除了短文阅读长,其他的都很好👍👍👍👍👍

垃圾

你M( on

China

经常闪退/我5G网,他跟我说远远不够

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

树鱼英语 Competitors

Name
出口成章—爱阅读,会写作!
语文同步、阅读写作 、朗读书写好帮手
全阅读
学有优教
达美嘉(家长端)
鑫考云阅
出口成章老师-让每一个孩子出口成章
让每一个孩子出口成章
校内外
技能云南平台
技能云南职业培训管理服务平台
云教学习
智能教辅,轻松学习,让学习更加高效
聪明米奇

树鱼英语 Installs

Last 30 days

树鱼英语 Revenue

Last 30 days

树鱼英语 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 树鱼英语 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.