飞行之翼

快人一步,永不停飞

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

飞行之翼 FAQ

  • Is 飞行之翼 free?

    Yes, 飞行之翼 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 飞行之翼 legit?

    ⚠️ The 飞行之翼 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 飞行之翼 cost?

    飞行之翼 is free.

  • What is 飞行之翼 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 飞行之翼 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in South Africa yet.
Ratings History

飞行之翼 Reviews

收割飞行学员的镰刀

电锯长颈鹿 on

China

题库定价严重过高,从学飞到现在,各种考试连题库都充了1500多元,就是看准了飞行学员圈子小,没有替代品罢了。唉..想未成年人退款了。

垃圾

好用到感人 on

China

你更新还不如不更新真没脑子

差评,错买不退钱

卟卟行 on

China

大家注意,题库不准,买错不退钱,客服态度极差。

闪退

99654746123 on

China

更了些啥玩意啊

其他都可以忍受,但是题库原题率极低!

命比咖啡甜 on

China

航线科目一,同学开的考拉,都说体验不好不能横屏,因为2年前航线改革前考过,当时用的飞翼,所以我这次也买了飞翼,开通前有提示说只刷秘题就可以,但是我基础题库刷了一遍,秘题刷了两遍去考试,只能说原题只有十几道,变形题大概二十几道(看过飞翼的解析应该能选出来),剩下的题都是没见过的,英语都看不懂,更别说做了。结果当然是挂了。题库都是改革前的题基本上没什么用,里面的课程或许有用吧,但时间来不及慢慢上课了。 比考拉多花了一倍的价钱,原题率不如考拉四分之一,app做的再好,课堂讲的再好也没用啊。

一直闪退

快晴丶丶 on

China

非常逆天,一直闪退

飞行之翼?小众圈子割韭菜的工具罢了

youwillbeokay on

China

也不知道获取题库成本多高值得花这么多钱买一个限时题库,就不说有很多错题,很多题连解析都没有,你们收这么多钱用到哪里去了?刷题软件最基本的解析都没有,很难想象这运营商有多黑,给一星是因为最低只是一星

不好用

evcard on

China

垃圾软件 错题极多

收费偏高 定价不合理

夏季🚗 on

China

收费偏高 定价不合理 就题库哪这么贵啊!

闪退太离谱了啊

怎么搞啊。。。。。 on

China

闪退闪退

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Grossing
68

飞行之翼 Installs

Last 30 days

飞行之翼 Revenue

Last 30 days

飞行之翼 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 飞行之翼 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.