梨课多对一

多对一专属服务,专注于提升学生的学习能力

Description

梨课多对一,是一个创新型在线教育产品。十余年教研沉淀,多对一专属服务,大数据驱动教学,用科技助力教育公平。AI领航,高效学习,温暖陪伴,因材施教,使高中生的学习能力得到全面提升。
【功能特色】
专属计划:根据学生学习情况,定制专属学习方案,全面提升学习能力
辅导答疑:助教老师群内答疑
无限看课:课程有效期内随时可看,哪里不会学哪里

In-Apps

【山山数学】新高一精选衔接班
24,990.00 ₱
【山山数学】高一系统提升班(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【山山数学】高二系统提升班(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【超哥物理】高一系统提升班(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【超哥物理】高二系统提升班(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【山山数学】高一系统提升班新教材(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【超哥物理】2022高考物理95分目标班(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【超哥物理】高一系统提升班新教材(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【超哥物理】高二系统提升班新教材(精选)
49,990.00 ₱
【山山数学】2022高考数学135分目标班(精选)
49,990.00 ₱

Screenshots

梨课多对一 FAQ

  • Is 梨课多对一 free?

    Yes, 梨课多对一 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 梨课多对一 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 梨课多对一 cost?

    梨课多对一 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 47,490.00 ₱.

  • What is 梨课多对一 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 梨课多对一 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Philippines yet.
Ratings History

梨课多对一 Reviews

No Reviews in Philippines
App doesn't have any reviews in Philippines yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

梨课多对一 Competitors

Name
小学语文助手五年级下册(最新部编人教版)
跟读与手写结合的同步点读辅导App
领世直播课-高中高考名师在线辅导
高考模拟真题必考解析
Primary Chinese Book 6B
鲸学
高中选考专家
卓越复习平台
进名校
说题
记录同学自己的讲题过程,学生输出式学习、教师作业优化好工具
小新课堂HD
优质学习平台
音乐窝教学端-智能互动课堂教学软件
老师轻松教,学生高效学!
才华横溢

梨课多对一 Installs

Last 30 days

梨课多对一 Revenue

Last 30 days

梨课多对一 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 梨课多对一 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.