茶苑双扣-浙江人的游戏

Description

三国题材双扣玩法,打牌的同时一起重温三国历史!

In-Apps

30钻石
$0.99
60钻石
$0.99
300钻石
$3.99
680钻石
$9.99
1680钻石
$24.99
3280钻石
$49.99
1元首充礼包
$0.99

Screenshots

茶苑双扣 FAQ

  • Is 茶苑双扣 free?

    Yes, 茶苑双扣 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 茶苑双扣 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 茶苑双扣 cost?

    茶苑双扣 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $13.13.

  • What is 茶苑双扣 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 茶苑双扣 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3 out of 5

1 ratings in United States

5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
Ratings History

茶苑双扣 Reviews

太垃圾了,完全就是付费才能玩!

完全没有任何体验感!还要经常卡BUG地图又小还是单机游戏 on

China

下载完了以后就是真的充钱才能玩!

差劲

一壶更多的是 on

China

玩了一段时间不让玩了,一下改规则,差评,全卸了

改不了名字吗

星际十绝地 on

China

怎么改名字啊

垃圾游戏,我1万多分怎么都不能玩了

我 是 你 的 王子犯法 on

China

垃圾

垃圾

这个大侠不太冷 on

China

超级垃圾的一个双扣,没有下载的慎重了

温州人体验

云南三机位 on

China

没有体验感的游戏,这是一个垃圾开发者!

哪个垃圾工程师谁开发的

色丐的莽 on

China

动不动出牌按钮不见了,明明能赢变成输,你开发个什么玩意,搞不来回家玩泥巴去吧

ipad没办法做那个广/告任务!

为什么要评论以后才能获取vip on

China

ipad没办法做广告任务

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

茶苑双扣 Installs

Last 30 days

茶苑双扣 Revenue

Last 30 days

茶苑双扣 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 茶苑双扣 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Games
Languages
English
Recent release
1.0.11 (3 years ago )
Released on
Mar 16, 2021 (4 years ago )
Last Updated
2 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.