秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车

Description

秦皇岛公交卡是由秦皇岛公交公司推出的扫码乘车app。

Screenshots

秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 FAQ

  • Is 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 free?

    Yes, 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 cost?

    秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 is free.

  • What is 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in India yet.
Ratings History

秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 Reviews

最近为什么不能充值了

没名字的我穷 on

China

想用都用不了了,为什么充值点不了呢

从一个app就能体现出到底怎么样

Timbabear on

China

使用支付宝乘车码没有优惠时候就是2元,使用美团固定1.6;使用苹果自带的津京冀一卡通更是各种问题,要么刷了好几次都是失败,要么就是瞬间刷了两次费用,更可笑的是刷卡成功但是公交车机器没有响,给司机看,人家让我念出来,要有刷卡时间和车牌号,大姐!你告诉我用什么东西什么软件刷完了有车牌号?搞笑呢?你们的机器不响,我用苹果nfc和美团刷完了都有记录,其他人刷完的你怎么不问问有没有车牌号呢?啊?

充值之后不能退款

啦啦DAYTOY on

China

充值之后就没用过,没有退款选项,甚至连个客服联系方式都没有

软件不能用

zy979 on

China

充值后无法退款。请速解决

不能及时生成二维码

這个"傻钕人 on

China

不能及时生成二维码,卡屏,闪退,希望及时维护APP,早日解决问题

闪退,加载失败等问题

脑海回想 on

China

目前已经不能正常使用了,二维码加载不出来,加载超时,加载失败,充值闪退,加载二维码闪退!希望能解决一下,谢谢。

用不了

实在想不出来昵称了 on

China

为什么用不了了?

这个app缺点还有很多,乘车价格比支付宝要优惠,给予5星鼓励

童一童 on

China

作为秦皇岛市民,这个软件的出现打破了支付宝扫码乘车的2元/次,和秦皇岛市公交a卡一个价格,很优惠了。但由于这个软件目前还是第一个版本,各项功能优待优化,比如扫码时屏幕光不能自动增亮,以至于扫码总是刷不上。另外建议充值金额起充价降低!目前一次最少冲20,希望可以充值任意金额或者最低5元起步也是可以的。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 Installs

Last 30 days

秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 Revenue

Last 30 days

秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 秦皇岛公交卡-扫码乘车 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.