Description

助力于幼儿园信息化转型且以评价为核心的智慧校园平台,致力于为园所提供专业的内容,为幼儿园与家长搭建沟通的桥梁。

Screenshots

孩子通园所端 FAQ

  • Is 孩子通园所端 free?

    Yes, 孩子通园所端 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 孩子通园所端 legit?

    ⚠️ The 孩子通园所端 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 孩子通园所端 cost?

    孩子通园所端 is free.

  • What is 孩子通园所端 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 孩子通园所端 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Austria yet.
Ratings History

孩子通园所端 Reviews

184523678152698409955…… on

China

垃圾的不行,垃圾,太差了,难用的要死,一点都不科学

不好用不好用

文文文文文文子 on

China

一点都不好用,选择的领域不齐全

很不好用

深蓝Andy on

China

这是那个人拍脑袋想出来的App,还分二个App,一个注册了另一个就没办法登陆。

xvy…… on

China

不流畅

太好用啦!

请自觉爆炸 on

China

发个三分钟视频发了一个小时,上传后教师端也看不到,家长段倒是看到了,两个端又不一样!这类现象万一视频里出现什么不合适的地方,家长先看么 剪辑了半天一上传回到解放前,直接原封不动又上传了,这功能太牛了,告诉我们要保持初心么,这是个什么组织!我严重怀疑! 每天打开先卡顿!重新登录!卡!卡!卡!没用过这么好用的app! 上传孩子照片说什么生成电子相册,ai识别,识别个头,最后从电子相册找孩子那个孩子都有,识别什么了我请问?! 没有一个好用的功能!

无法发送消息

westwoooood on

China

作为班主任,群消息发送通知经常是红点发不出去,给一颗星都嫌多

活跃度计算方式不合理

Annetta_qyx on

China

目前活跃度计算方式的评价活跃度计算不合理,个性化评价记录只算一次,而且计算时还要再乘以10。同样是做评价,不同方式记录差距太多了。

形式主义浪费时间

旻酱 on

China

老师不专注于教学,整天给你搞这些成长档案,有病啊,早点倒闭,拍点照给家长看看已经蛮好了,还要专门做这些多余的事,与教育背道而驰!

无力吐槽的APP

kate_sha on

China

什么后台居然存活到现在,还必须使用,真的和晓黑板没办法比

难用

小黄鱼04 on

China

经常闪退 家长已经阅读了通知可是在未查看通知处还是有显示 各种不便捷

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

孩子通园所端 Competitors

孩子通园所端 Installs

Last 30 days

孩子通园所端 Revenue

Last 30 days

孩子通园所端 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 孩子通园所端 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.