中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流

Description

一三二冊的中國佛教經典寶藏,乃彙集三藏十二部中,精選重要的大小乘經典及各宗派論書所成。經典部分,有阿含經、金剛經、法華經、楞嚴經等二十餘部;佛弟子闡釋佛陀說法內容的論著,有大智度論、中論、瑜伽師地論、攝大乘論等二十餘部;中國佛教各宗派所依據的典籍、祖師的著作,亦收錄不少,如景德傳燈錄、祖堂集、摩訶止觀、華嚴師子章、萬善同歸集等。近代祖師、高僧的撰述,有來果禪師語錄、弘一大師文集選要、星雲禪話等十餘部。這套書是白話佛典的精華集粹,是學佛者的現代版藏經叢書。尤其,透過題解與源流,解說每一部經典的主旨、重點大意,分析經典思想的形成,更能掌握經中義理,是佛教徒不可或缺的工具書。

Screenshots

中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 FAQ

  • Is 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 free?

    Yes, 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 cost?

    中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 is free.

  • What is 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Ecuador yet.
Ratings History

中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 Reviews

是题解源流不是一套书。

沐沅步步 on

China

打开后发现内容比较少感觉很奇怪,仔细看发现是题解源流不是那一套丛书。不过因为在安卓手机上下载了简体的佛光大辞典,所以觉得也没有关系,是自己不细心,没弄清楚。

根本不能下载!

维摩诘居士 on

China

非常差 扣费后不能下载,根本用不了。大家千万别买。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
97
Top Paid
185
Top Paid
312
Top Paid
346
Top Paid
372

中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 Competitors

中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 Installs

Last 30 days

中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 Revenue

Last 30 days

中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 中國佛教白話經典寶藏-題解源流 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Languages
Chinese, English
Recent release
2.0 (1 year ago )
Released on
Mar 1, 2015 (10 years ago )
Last Updated
2 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.