五子棋-双人对战版,天天单机棋牌游戏

不需要网络的游戏,无需wifi

Published by: 手游
Downloads
Revenue

Description

黑白纵横,五子连珠
古色古香的游戏界面
还等什么,快来挑战五子棋吧
五子棋游戏的历史可谓源远流长,是一款老少皆宜的双人对弈纯策略游戏,不仅能增强逻辑思维能力,提高智力,而且富含哲理,有助于修身养性。
保留传统模式,开创新的玩法,精美游戏画面,让你沉浸在五子棋的世界里,无法自拔。

Screenshots

五子棋-双人对战版 FAQ

  • Is 五子棋-双人对战版 free?

    Yes, 五子棋-双人对战版 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 五子棋-双人对战版 legit?

    ‼️️ The 五子棋-双人对战版 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 五子棋-双人对战版 cost?

    五子棋-双人对战版 is free.

  • What is 五子棋-双人对战版 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 五子棋-双人对战版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Malaysia yet.
Ratings History

五子棋-双人对战版 Reviews

五子棋

路中路上 on

China

yyds

五星好评

老六首领 on

China

玩上瘾了,好玩。

好烦

石家庄的确是 on

China

每玩完一局就有一个广告,而且还点不掉!

我太难了。

点个赞吧TJ on

China

每次都是输,真是太难了。

打造

维科 on

China

打卡

第一关都太难了。

静影沉璧之梦 on

China

第一关都太难了,因为我是个五子棋小白 看广告还以为满简单的 结果玩了一关就觉得太难了,最多四颗星星。

五子棋

侯少坡 on

China

给100颗心非常满意这种游戏

豆豆12345

无奈豆12345 on

China

豆豆12345

垃圾

天咯是咯弄hi on

China

电脑菜的一批

wink you3 on

China

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

五子棋-双人对战版 Installs

Last 30 days

五子棋-双人对战版 Revenue

Last 30 days

五子棋-双人对战版 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 五子棋-双人对战版 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Publisher
手游
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, Chinese
Recent release
2.3 (1 year ago )
Released on
Aug 7, 2023 (1 year ago )
Last Updated
4 weeks ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.